UCSF Health reviews

3.7

70% would recommend to a friend

(903 total reviews)
avatar

Suresh Gunasekaran

42% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

UCSF Health has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 903 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The UCSF Health employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

903 reviews
2.0
Aug 23, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pays great Decent benefits for my family Set schedule Pay checks never comes late

Cons

U get pay more to deal with BS from supervisor or manager... Anytime u make a mistake... They jumped at u like sharks... Never gets compliment or very rarely... Blame u fast; praise u slow... Instead of focusing on helping you; they look for u to fail....

2.0
Aug 22, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Learned a lot of clinical skills, and saw my knowledge growing tremendously, valued friendships, decent benefits, accessible by public transportation, several employment opportunities.

Cons

I have worked at UCSF for 11 years, a decade ago it was an amazing place to work, but it has become a conglomerate, not a hospital. As an employee, they tend to not support you, especially during times of personal crisis. Forgot it's motto-Pride. Trying to compete with other hospitals. Try having employee Educational studies, tuition reimbursement. Support Advancement in education.

3.0
Aug 4, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Prestige of hospital and academic medical center Great and helpful colleagues; outstanding nursing staff Benefits: not as good as some larger private employers, but great variety Wage Works option for commuting costs -- subsidy Gym membership -- subsidy, though not free. Mission Bay has better options than Parnassus, but good facilities Options for advancement

Cons

Commuting and congestion around Mission Bay. This will worsen with major construction projects and the basketball arena. Difficult enough to get out of the Mission Bay campus on baseball home game nights. Will worsen with the basketball arena. Some managers are not provided with enough support or training for onboarding new employees. It is not appropriate to tell new hires: "oh, we don't do onboarding in this department." If your program, dept or projects has/have multiple funders -- feds, corporate, and foundations, you should expect conflicts between the funders and more input -- some call interference -- from donors or funders. This can be difficult, offputting, and disheartening to clinicians, PIs, or lab heads accustomed to more free rein from NIH or CDC funders. Thus, implementing a more entrepreneurial spirit or culture, particularly if candidates come from Lean Six Sigma heavy clinical environments, or the consulting work, can be very difficult. Foundation funding can be year to year and not the five-year windows many in research academic are accustomed. It can be very difficult to hire mid-level or junior staffers for one year, even post-doc fellows, with "pending or likely re-funding" in the job description. San Francisco had less than 4% unemployment. Most people in the expensive SF Bay Area need more job security than a one-year assignment. If that is what you can offer, recruit from the local graduate schools more actively, for students getting graduate degrees at night or in executive MBA or MPH programs.

Viewing 649 - 651 of 903 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,033 UCSF Health reviews submitted anonymously by UCSF Health employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if UCSF Health is right for you.