Visa Inc. reviews

Since this is a one star review, I will start by saying I didn't submit this lightly. I read several other reviews that indicate a similar experience in Austin and now hope that this will lead to some sort of positive change. I see that HR responds to these by saying to call a "hotline" which I did months before I wrote this ( August 2018). This should be the first red flag. To be fair, I will also say the Technology organization is divided into two different organizations. One is, DMPD ( digital mobile product development) which likely doesn't have the same issues I am about to enumerate. Let me address why I gave everything one star ( except benefits) : Career Opportunities : I applied, interviewed and tested for an internal position. Was then asked by the hiring manager to continue to the last phase of the process but was blocked by my current management. No opportunity to learn and apply new tech, and I am not alone in this assessment. This is an example of how they publish a policy about internal mobility but allow management to actively ruin your career. Nobody has your back. Compensation : Was lured in by a pension, but a few months later it was "frozen" i.e. canceled. They are stingy with stock as well, and the ESPP is not great, as you are forced to hold shares for over a year which means several are under water right now. They have a 10% 401K match but most the fidelity funds have lost money this year. There is no fund above a morningstar rating of 3. Their benefits are decent ( 4 weeks PTO ), and better than most any smaller company, but definitely not in the top tier. Work Life Balance : This can be one of the worst things about Visa. Working in Technology, the release process can be manual and antiquated. Many career Visa employees are resistant to modernizing such processes. Get ready to spend all weekend with little sleep doing a manual release. It's not fun, and you don't learn anything. Secondly, there is not good co-location and ownership with teams in some organizations including mine. If you are in the US, you may find yourself being asked to attend meetings at all hours of the day and night, during lunch etc.. Can't get away for a workout and there is little flexibility in schedule. Senior Management : Every year, they have an annual survey, and the feedback on important items like having the tools to do your job is low and blatantly ignored ( every year). Nothing meaningful is ever done, They think making a better expense reporting mechanism, or ticketing system is "good enough". The laptop you rely on to do your work is so bogged down by onerous security software and constant patching it's really tough to be efficient. If you're lucky your laptop will be rebooted several times a week and sometimes take hours to become available again. Otherwise, you'll end up taking it to IT for a long time. Also, the proxy server you are forced to use will block you from basic tools such as github and downloading simple eclipse plugins. Blocking some sites makes sense, but basic stuff is not attainable with any reliability. Culture and Values : This is the worst aspect of Visa. It is the least diverse workplace I've ever been a part of. It's a top down sort of arrangement where your manager suddenly tells you to do 5 different things out of the blue, because his/her manager told them to make you do this. Given that most employees are fearful they generally drop what they are doing to try and please the manager. At the end of the day you end up with your head spinning and there is little if any acknowledgement when you fight through the clutter and accomplish something meaningful. English is spoken less than other languages in the cubicles. I felt like an alien in my own country working here.

Visa is a great company with good benefits. The current Technology leadership is by far one of the worst I have seen in my 20 yrs career in the technology industry. The current leaders are former program managers who has very low technical skill but very high political skill. Asks bookish questions that are not relevant to technical discussions, which annoys technical managers. Promotes nepotism. One of the Senior Leader joined as an individual contributor less than 3 yrs ago, after three quick promotions, he is now a senior leader responsible for important Engineering and Operations functions and probably more soon. His only qualification for his current position is his political and manipulation skills. Engineering is a transformational role in the organization; Visa needs a transformational technologist and not a politician in this role. This is the current state of Technology leadership at Visa, managed by a bunch of program managers who are politicians and not technologists. My colleagues have more horrible stories of nepotism in their respective product teams, especially in one of the newly formed groups in India.