employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Works Applications

Is this your company?

Works Applications Developer reviews

3.8

61% would recommend to a friend

(86 total reviews)

Masayuki Makino

82% approve of CEO

38% positive business outlook

Developer employees have rated Works Applications with 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 86 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Developer professionals have a good working experience there. Works Applications is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Developer professionals compared to other employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

86 reviews
2.0
Jul 21, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- good salary as a fresh grad - one free drink per day - easy to get your leave application approved - flexible working hour as long as working for 8 hours a day

Cons

- just think: overemphasis on thinking results in an environment with many incompetent and unprofessional leaders and engineers who can neither PRODUCE clean code nor DELIVER good products. The company prefers the obedient employees to the technically capable ones and elect the former to be leaders. - no scapegoating: the distribution of responsibility is deliberately blurred, such that those who are truly to be blamed for buggy code, wrong technical decisions and unstable architecture can hide themselves behind their scapegoats. - breakthrough: many of the breakthroughs just break through the obstacles made within the company, such as unsuitable technical choices and buggy implementations. Highly usable and widely accepted libraries, tools and frameworks are out there, yet the engineering team chose to build our own. - contingency plan: do we have a contingency plan in the midst of financial struggles? - human skills: the so-called leaders do not represent or fight for the welfare of his/her subordinates. Often they stand with their leaders and squeeze their subordinates together. - boss-driven over product-oriented: implementation, troubleshooting and decision-making are driven by bosses' demands, rather than being rooted in facts or product oriented. Development may change course anytime as long as some big bosses want it that way, despite the fact that it breaks development roadmap or apparently violates engineering practices. - process over engineering: overly complicated processes are made to restrict technical discussion and decisions and writing, submitting and releasing code, which is iconic Japanese Ho-Ren-So culture and greatly endorsed by higher managers. Managers block developers from submitting code, thinking it is able to stabilize the build and improve the quality of products. - firefighting over troubleshooting: too many engineers are mobilised for putting off sparks instead of solving the root problem. Too many temporary fixes have been made permanent. Firefighters are rewarded and admired as heroes while those who prevent the fire from the very beginning are often neglected.

3.0
Mar 3, 2017

Environment Review

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- New technologies to learn - Flexible working hours - Easy to change team to learn new thing - High paid especially for fresh graduate - There are some friendly and excellent developers

Cons

- A lot of hard deadline, working overtime is quite common. It usually we have to work overtime 1 or 2 hours. There are some teams have to work overnight sometimes. - Military ranking system. All employees are ranked and judged like military soldier - Bad evaluation system to judge employee performance. It highly depends on team leader or manager's perspective. It's not fair across the company. There are some teams whose leader or managers are good, they don't need to work hard but still get high grade. However, other teams are not under good manager, even they work hard, they still get bad grade. Bad grade means not increase in salary and going to higher rank. - Deadlines are a lot. Developers usually do not have time to think about good solution to solve problem. My personal opinion is quality product is not so good in term of designing. Later, it will really cost in maintenance phase.

4.0
Feb 7, 2017

Good company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work culture. Flexible timing. Friendly co-worker

Cons

Evaluation policy is not good. It all depend on your image, how your manager consider you.

Viewing 76 - 78 of 86 Reviews

Glassdoor has 311 Works Applications reviews submitted anonymously by Works Applications employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Works Applications is right for you.