Zillow reviews

3.4

54% would recommend to a friend

(2,509 total reviews)
avatar

Jeremy Wacksman

57% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Zillow has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 2,509 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Zillow employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
4.0
Nov 17, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Terrific people, most of whom have backgrounds from some of the top area companies like MS, Expedia, and Amazon. Big industry ripe for change- real estate is a multi-billion dollar category stuck in the dark ages. Chance to work on a disruptive business. Good work-life balance for a start up. Interesting and challenging work- you will work on projects that are core to the company and to its vision.

Cons

Stingy stock grants- which is surprising given that this is what should be motivating employees. Liquidity event is many years away- plan on at least 3-4 years before your stock has value. Still struggling to drive revenue- advertising is an ok way to go, but the company needs more revenue streams. Limited career upside as it is a small company.

2.0
May 31, 2026

Toxic culture and leadership changes led to downfall

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Zillow was once one of the best companies I've ever worked for. The culture made you genuinely excited to come to work, you believed in what they were building, felt valued, and could see that leadership truly cared about its people. What Spencer Rascoff built was something special, a company with a true North Star. For a long stretch, it was exceptional.

Cons

When a new VP of Sales was brought in, she dismantled the culture that made Zillow great. She stacked the organization with people she brought from her previous company, replacing proven leaders with loyalists who followed her in. I sat in meetings where leaders were explicitly told we needed to "skim the fat" and reduce headcount, starting with anyone who wasn't aligned with her vision. This wasn't restructuring. It was a targeted purge dressed up in business language. Legacy leaders who stood up for their employees during this period were unceremoniously let go, not because they were wrong, but because they were fighting too hard for their people and not falling in line. These were the right leaders doing the right thing, and they were punished for it. If you want to understand the culture that was created, look no further than how reorganizations were communicated: employees who had given years to this company were let go while the VP delivered the news from a treadmill or eating lunch on a Zoom call. When the news went out via email, the departure of long-tenured employees was buried in the body of the message, a single line, sometimes not even mentioned at all. That is not leadership. That is indifference. She let go of long-tenured leaders who helped shape the company, and quarterly employee surveys hit their lowest marks in over a decade. Rather than taking accountability, ironic for a company that lists "own it" as a core value, she blamed front-line managers. She lasted less than three years before being moved out, but the damage was done. The mental toll on employees was real. People were taking mental health days and FMLA leave because the environment had become that toxic. When employees returned from using the very resources the company publicly promotes, they were penalized or quietly pushed out. Multiple employees raised the same concerns about returning from FMLA only to be placed on a PIP within 30 days, people who had never been on a performance plan in their entire careers. I experienced this firsthand, I had a mental breakdown due to the culture, was reprimanded within weeks of returning from FMLA, filed an HR complaint, and was told my allegations were unwarranted. Other employees who had raised the same concerns were never interviewed as part of my investigation. I was then told to return to work for the very person I had just reported. HR is not your ally. Investigations are opaque, responses are scripted, meetings go nowhere, and retaliation follows. Compensation is equally frustrating, even top performers are capped at 3–5% raises, and stock options vest over four years in a structure that becomes a wash if you can't sustain peak ratings every single year. What Spencer Rascoff spent years building was dismantled in less than five years. Zillow lost its North Star, the consumer, and shifted its focus to chasing revenue at the expense of everything that made it great. You can see it in the stock price, the survey scores, and the turnover. The unspoken message to legacy employees became clear: thanks for building this, but we don't need you anymore. I wanted to finish my career at Zillow. Instead, I was one of the people pushed out after giving everything to this company.

avatar
Zillow Response
2w
Thank you for taking the time to share your review and for the many years you spent at Zillow. It’s clear from your comments that you cared deeply about the company, its culture and the people who work here. We recognize the dedication that comes with spending more than a decade helping build something, and we appreciate you sharing your experience. The concerns you’ve raised are significant, and they do not reflect the culture we strive to create for our employees. We know that periods of change can be experienced differently by different people, but we take feedback like this seriously and want to better understand it. We would welcome the opportunity to learn more about your experience. If you'd like to discuss this with us, please email careers@zillowgroup.com.
1.0
Mar 23, 2026

Zillow is in the toilet

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits and money but that doesn’t last long, like slapping lipstick on a pig.

Cons

They are gradually moving all teams to either El Salvador or Mexico making upward mobility non existent. They treat internal candidates like dog water. Have been told that maybe i should look for outside opportunities if I want to possibly move up. Constant reorg changes. Hiring from T-mobile has just made the environment stale as they would rather hire their friends.

avatar
Zillow Response
2mo
Thank you for your candid feedback. We know that growth and career progression experiences can vary, and your perspective gives us valuable insight into how that’s showing up across teams. We take feedback around internal mobility and hiring practices seriously and are committed to ensuring opportunities are fair and accessible. For current employees, there are established ways to raise concerns and provide additional context, including confidential options through AllVoices or by connecting with your HR Business Partner. Detailed information about reporting these concerns is available on the company intranet.
Viewing 280 - 282 of 2,509 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,696 Zillow reviews submitted anonymously by Zillow employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Zillow is right for you.