Candidates applying for Admissions Manager roles take an average of 16 days to get hired, when considering 4 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Charlie Health overall takes an average of 21 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Charlie Health as a Admissions Manager according to 4 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 38%
Phone interview: 25%
Presentation: 13%
Group panel interview: 13%
Other: 13%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Charlie Health (Texas City, TX) in Jun 2023
Interview
I was contacted by a recruiter, and felt the initial interview went well. I was asked if I could do a follow interview the next day as they were really impressed with my qualifications. At the start of the second interview I was told that the position had been filled, but they had another position with less pay and night and weekend hours available. It was a total bait and switch approach. Very dishonest. The fact that the slurry range was a $75k span should have been my first clue that something was off.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
We discussed my experience and salary requirements, nothing crazy.
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Charlie Health
Interview
The recruiter was great and made clear expectations. The hiring manager was not. He was late to the interview, was very rude and disinterested before I even spoke. Maybe he was having a bad day, but definitely a waste of my time.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Charlie Health (Jacksonville, FL) in Oct 2024
Interview
The interview process seemed very straightforward. However, I was asked questions that didn't seem to match up with the job description. I am a seasoned professional and would certainly have added quality to this growing start-up. I was ultimately denied the opportunity with little to no feedback as to why. When I asked for feedback, I was ignored. After looking deeper into the company demographics, I was surprised to see that most of the company is led by women. I have absolutely no issue with anyone as I have worked under and with remarkable women and have a great record of working alongside anyone and obtaining maximum results. My motto is "whomever the best candidate is, should get the position". Unfortunately, it seems like this is a very young immature company that seeks to hire with other objectives in mind. I also found several of my former employees who worked there that I had trained at previous jobs and gave them great referrals when called by this organization to verify their work history, In short, I strongly believe that, in my last interview I was discriminated against by the Director because of my gender and age. I considered filing an EEOC complaint but did not see this as a productive use of my time and they would only deny it and continue with this behavior. In the end, companies like this eventually fail & cease to exist, so maybe I am the lucky one here. After reading the many toxic reviews, I am sure that I am.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How would I discipline an employee for not meeting KPI standards?