QA Engineer I applicants have rated the interview process at QA Wolf with 2.7 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 16% positive. To compare, the company-average is 21.8% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for QA Engineer I roles take an average of 8 days to get hired, when considering 31 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at QA Wolf overall takes an average of 10 days.
Common stages of the interview process at QA Wolf as a QA Engineer I according to 31 Glassdoor interviews include:
Skills test: 52%
One on one interview: 22%
Background check: 13%
Presentation: 4%
Other: 4%
Phone interview: 4%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at QA Wolf
Interview
I applied for this position because I saw QA Wolf's ad in my boot camp's Slack messages. Via email we set up an interview time to take place over Zoom (this was and is a remote-only position). When we met, it was very nice! The interviewer was easy to chat with and they asked good questions. The first stage was the typical Q&A format, while the second stage was the technical interview. The task was to write five tests in three hours, with the interviewer being available at all times for questions and feedback along the way. This task was very doable and made me feel confident in my ability to provide value to this company.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
"Tell me about a time where you were working on a project in a team, and there were conflicts about the direction the project should take."
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at QA Wolf
Interview
Takehome assignment consisting of Playwright tests, non-compensated, that you must do in your own time.
Nebulous requirements about what makes it go "above and beyond". You go above and beyond, obviously, teach yourself Playwright, spend hours of your life on their assignment, and receive a vague email message 2 weeks later that you didn't go above and beyond *enough* by some arbitrary standard. Avoid.
They didn't even watch my Loom.
I applied online. I interviewed at QA Wolf (Reminderville, OH) in Dec 2025
Interview
Take-home project with baseline expectations to scrape a site for determining the sequential order of posts on a page, but yeah, you guessed it, they are expecting that you spend hours competing against other 'hypothetical candidates who will add advanced features and go beyond basic requirements' without compensation.
(email I replied to them with)
------
Lol
If you're going to require people to include certain materials in their application, it would be fair to actually review/watch the materials they spent time uploading and working on. 0 views on the Loom you required that I upload, with no way to actually edit clips unless I pay for a Loom account.
It was work on a project that I took time out to do for free and your response, instead of at least being appreciative of the fact that I did the work, is to say that I didn't cover extra credit points. You do realize that candidates who have the luxury of time will be able to complete that and that it's not an assessment of core competency, but rather who's willing to sell themselves out the most and spend hours without compensation. I have other duties (that will actually pay me) besides working on pointless assignments you are going to nitpick.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Use playwright to confirm sequential order of articles on hacker news
Take home assignment. Wants you to be outside the box. Then there is a work simulated session as well. Which is paid and delivered after the interview. The process is smooth and recommended.