Their QA application is fraudulent. I was told to create a loom video which I painstakingly recorded. After spending a good chunk of my day on this take-home test, I was sent a rejection letter only hours later. After the rejection letter, I went on my loom to see the views on the new video and there were 0 views.
I sent them a kind email asking for feedback, and they didn't respond. A HUGE waste of my time. I wouldn't be surprised if their ad is a fake job posting collecting data for their LLMs, like all the companies out there these days with no sense of morality.
They say "One of our core values is being open and transparent" -- well that was a lie.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Take-home test which they didn't even bother to look at. Stop wasting people's time
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at QA Wolf
Interview
Takehome assignment consisting of Playwright tests, non-compensated, that you must do in your own time.
Nebulous requirements about what makes it go "above and beyond". You go above and beyond, obviously, teach yourself Playwright, spend hours of your life on their assignment, and receive a vague email message 2 weeks later that you didn't go above and beyond *enough* by some arbitrary standard. Avoid.
They didn't even watch my Loom.
I applied online. I interviewed at QA Wolf (Reminderville, OH) in Dec 2025
Interview
Take-home project with baseline expectations to scrape a site for determining the sequential order of posts on a page, but yeah, you guessed it, they are expecting that you spend hours competing against other 'hypothetical candidates who will add advanced features and go beyond basic requirements' without compensation.
(email I replied to them with)
------
Lol
If you're going to require people to include certain materials in their application, it would be fair to actually review/watch the materials they spent time uploading and working on. 0 views on the Loom you required that I upload, with no way to actually edit clips unless I pay for a Loom account.
It was work on a project that I took time out to do for free and your response, instead of at least being appreciative of the fact that I did the work, is to say that I didn't cover extra credit points. You do realize that candidates who have the luxury of time will be able to complete that and that it's not an assessment of core competency, but rather who's willing to sell themselves out the most and spend hours without compensation. I have other duties (that will actually pay me) besides working on pointless assignments you are going to nitpick.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Use playwright to confirm sequential order of articles on hacker news
Take home assignment. Wants you to be outside the box. Then there is a work simulated session as well. Which is paid and delivered after the interview. The process is smooth and recommended.
QA Engineer applicants have rated the interview process at QA Wolf with 2.7 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 16% positive. To compare, the company-average is 21.8% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for QA Engineer roles take an average of 8 days to get hired, when considering 31 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at QA Wolf overall takes an average of 10 days.
Common stages of the interview process at QA Wolf as a QA Engineer according to 31 Glassdoor interviews include:
Skills test: 52%
One on one interview: 22%
Background check: 13%
Presentation: 4%
Other: 4%
Phone interview: 4%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -