The process starts by having a phone screening with a recruiter followed by: phone interview with AM on the team, writing exercise, call with AM on the team to go over the exercise and then a 3 hour onsite interview meeting with different members of the team. It's a very organized process, but the onsite interview felt more like an interrogation than a 2 sided interview. Similarly to what another candidate said, you do not have any interaction with the manager until the onsite at the very end. I think this has the potential for bias, as you get very little time to actually prove yourself to management. You are asked to do some API troubleshooting followed by different exercises. Personally, I felt that half of the exercises were not relevant to the position. I found it all also difficult to get questions in. One of the interviewers was very combative and didn't let me get a word in without interrupting me. In the end, I received an email that they passed on my candidacy without any specific detail. I do appreciate that there was an offer to go over feedback on a call. My main point of feedback to recruitment is to make it more about actual scenarios and examples relevant to the job. One of the questions was to pick an app and act as a product manager, which would have been more relevant for an AM to talk about a project collaboration with product that resulted from client feedback.