Access reviews

3.6

60% would recommend to a friend

(243 total reviews)

Tony Skarupa

77% approve of CEO

44% positive business outlook

Access has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 243 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Access employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Retail & Wholesale industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

243 reviews
4.0
Aug 17, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

some great people to work with, family like atmosphere

Cons

suspect leadership decision, limited growth, haven't been able to keep good workers

avatar
Access Response
8y
Thank you for your feedback. I read each and every comment and take value from all of the constructive feedback we receive. I am happy to hear you feel the family like atmosphere that we strive to achieve. We do work hard to find great team members and hope to retain them by treating them well. In regards to suspect leadership decisions, limited growth and our inability to retain good team members, plus your advice to management to invest in better marketing and working better cross functionally, well…some of that is true. While I am confident we are making sound decisions at the leadership level and about leadership, I hope to always have our decisions challenged respectfully and openly. I am a transparent leader and often involve a lot of team members in decisions, including our most recent organizational transformation. I would be interested to hear more where you feel we have gone wrong. You might not be aware (which would surprise me), but we have made a lot of changes to our marketing and sales teams, including quite a bit of new leadership that should help increase our organic growth, but note that we have averaged growth of over 40% per year over the pasts seven years, so not sure I see “limited growth”. Regardless, I agree that we need to improve our sales and marketing efforts, all of which are underway now and are yielding great early results having increased bookings significantly over the prior year. We did also create “Better Way” teams to help address some of our most significant opportunities for improvement and those are cross-functional teams comprised of team members across various functions, so that we make sure to incorporate a lot of different stakeholders in improvement and implementation plans. The goal is to go forward with a clear sense of our mission and bring our different departments together to provide the very best service. I hope you see that manifesting in the near future. If you would like to contact me directly please email me at ralston@accesscorp.com and I will respond to you directly. Thanks, Rob
1.0
Jul 12, 2017

The worst

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There was a paycheck every other week

Cons

•Training was terrible •Management would never want to take blame for their mistakes •management expected drivers/warehouse to work however many hours needed to get it done but left as soon as they hit 8 hours for the day •extremely overworked •pay was lower than it should have been for the extreme workload •way to much expectations on the transportation specialists •trucks were constantly breaking down •didn't have enough equipment for all the drivers to fully be successful

avatar
Access Response
8y
Thanks for the detailed review and sharing so many specifics on opportunities we have to improve. Your review is very specific to our operation in Portland and that operation has had significant challenges after our most recent acquisition there. We have struggled to integrate the volume of activity with additional service well and clearly this put additional significant strain on you and your team members - and also our clients. We learned a lot of lessons from this acquisition, but it took too long. Please know that I don't ever condone, nor support, not giving our team members the right tools to complete their responsibilities, which includes fixing trucks and repair equipment efficiently and effectively. You're also right about training...our newest team member should not be the designated trainer for the new team members. I am not sure when you left, but I visited Portland in April specifically to try to understand more closely some of the issues we were experiencing there and also met with local leadership on many of these issues. I am confident that we have the right leadership in place to address these items. You outline some very specific items on improving in Portland and local management shares this in response: "In regards to Training, we have never had a new person provide training. Any new TM’s were trained and shadowed by a Lead and/or veteran Team Member. We have only had a few new hires in the past year, and they have not been serving as trainers. With some new leadership in place this year, we have improved the training process for our regular huddles and meetings. We are also in the early stages for a 2018 training calendar. I encourage collaboration and sharing knowledge among all of my Team Members, but actual training would be performed by a Lead or higher. Our challenges with an aging fleet, of various makes and models, are well known to the Leadership Team. We partnered with Penske to provide support for repairs and maintenance, and we have several other preferred vendors to help return broken vehicles to service as quickly as possible. [We] have been discussing which trucks need to be replaced for 2018, leaning towards the procurement of Non-CDL Trucks instead of larger CDL versions. Our courier vans and box trucks are in relatively good condition, and do not experience the breakdowns like [these] trucks. We have also made many investments in [transportation]-related equipment this year, including cones, gloves, vehicle kits, nifty grabbers, brooms, and lots of shred bin parts (locks, wheels, etc). At each of our Town Hall meetings and most of our huddles, we also ask the field TM’s if any equipment needs to be replaced, of if they have any equipment suggestions. There have been considerable strides in our dispatching efficiency since the beginning of the year, with the utilization of RoadNet and the onboarding of a Dispatch Lead. While it is true that some routes are slightly longer than others, this is not always avoidable. Team Members who finish a route early are re-dispatched to pick up additional stops from the routes which might be falling behind (traffic, truck breakdowns, etc). TM’s [handling another service] who come back early from a route are assigned work in the facility. The routes average about 25-30 stops per day per TS. This is comparable to other shredding companies, and results in an 8-10 hour workday. There are many uncontrollable circumstances on the road that might impact return times to the record center. Additional headcount was approved earlier this year, and an additional team member was brought on-board a few weeks ago (after much seeking and interviewing). He is currently being trained, and will have a dedicated route within the next 2-3 weeks. We have also discussed options for creating a “bench” for [transportation specialists], which includes cross training several [transportation specialists] and keeping an evergreen requisition open online. We have a newer Leadership Team that we are developing in collaboration with Human Resources. Some of the training tactics include scheduled 1:1’s each week with direct reports, the implementation of a Developmental Action Plan (DAP), discussions around Individual Development Plans (IDP), and many coaching sessions. We are getting better with our post-mortem approach for service issues or “mistakes”, which includes identifying root problems rather than applying quick fixes. This can be an uncomfortable process, especially for front line TM’s, as it requires greater accountability and deeper diving into individual actions. I have discussed this feedback with [HR], and we are going to address these points with the Team during an upcoming meeting. We have had many successful Team Meetings this year that have resolved similar issues, and I’m confident that we can also resolve these concerns." Thanks you again for your detailed review, Rob
1.0
Jan 8, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not to sure what to tell you

Cons

Don't believe the hype, hardly no chance to excel

avatar
Access Response
9y
Thank you for your review. I am sorry that you feel there isn't room to excel here at Access. I see that you worked here for less than one year, so that may have been why you didn't see much room to excel or for promotion. However, I am curious what other positions you applied for while you worked here and what your personal goals are for your professional development, besides just getting paid more in wages. For completeness and accuracy in my response here, I reviewed the most recent market compensation data and we pay at 99% of market rates for the Virginia, Maryland and Washington DC markets for cash compensation (I see you were in Virginia). So, we are very competitive with our wages there, I believe. I also think of compensation as a total package, not just the hourly wage. Included in that total package, we also match 100% of the first 3% for 401(k) contributions (a 100% return on your money) and pay a large percentage of family medical ( although our deductible is a bit high, which is something I am hoping to be able to address in March with our annual benefits renewal). Furthermore, we recently launched a benefits survey and are launching another company wide engagement survey this week, for the express purpose of gathering feedback so that we can invest more in the areas the team would like to see improvements and to see if the team feels like we have made improvements in the past year. I am hopeful that most of the team feels better than you do about what we have done and where we are making investments. I am most disappointed that you feel like I/we have been lying about what we do for the team. While I know we have lots of room for improvement, I think we have been very honest about what we are doing and not doing. I don't compromise my integrity and never ask others to do so, either. I would be very interested in hearing more on this topic. As always, please feel free to email directly at ralston@accesscorp.com. Thanks again for your review and I wish you the best, Rob
Viewing 37 - 39 of 243 Reviews

Glassdoor has 301 Access reviews submitted anonymously by Access employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Access is right for you.