Addison Group reviews

4.3

83% would recommend to a friend

(1,041 total reviews)
avatar

Thomas B. Moran

95% approve of CEO

78% positive business outlook

Addison Group has an employee rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars, based on 1,041 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Addison Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Human Resources & Staffing industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Mar 2, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Weekly Payments, really there are no other pros

Cons

Unable to reach employer after starting on client project. Poor email communication. Lack of interest in employee welfare. Promised benefits and negotiated hourly rate. Made to wait 90 days for benefits. Fell sick with flu during waiting period. UNABLE TO REACH ANYONE for help in communicating with employer after 5 days missed work. No expressed empathy by Addison Group or desire to help. Benefits denied after 90 days for questionable reasons (I was hired just before Thanksgiving and apparently did not meet some elusive requirement for minimum monthly billing November-December-January). I was not informed until end of February that I would not be eligible after enquiring unanswered several times. Was weirdly isolated by client upon return, and ultimately fired. Never heard a single word from Addison in this regard. DO NOT WORK FOR THIS FIRM. DO NOT HIRE THIS FIRM IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR PROJECT RESOURCES AND HOW THEY’RE TREATED/SUPPORTED BY THE AGENCY.

1.0
Dec 27, 2019

No Voice

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work from home - great benefits

Cons

I feel compelled to provide a “heads up” to my fellow Recruiters in the industry considering an opportunity with Addison Group as I wouldn’t want this to happen to anyone else what had happened with me. Earlier this year, I was hired on with Addison Group as a full desk Recruiter working remotely in South Florida. During my interview process, I requested and was granted the information that I would have access to a tool that would allow me to email multiple candidates and/or clients from the internal ATS (applicant tracking system). Since day 1, I had requested help and a demonstration on how to do this properly. I was referred to a nice young lady in the training department. She informed me she would go over this with me in a couple days. She was quite busy with trainings and unfortunately didn’t have the time to show me how to properly use the tool. Weeks went by and after several reminders I was finally given the time to go over the tool. It was more complicated than She had thought and we ran out of time as the 30 minutes went by with no clear direction on how to use the tool. It was clear to both of us that She had actually never used the tool in this manner. As a 100% commission Recruiter, this tool was important to me and I stressed to her the importance of this tool and how it’s been weeks since I requested access to the tool. I had conducted some research on my own and found an alternative tool that would work and suggested that I would be using in its place in order to do the job I was hired to do. She let me know that this was not a top priority of hers. She also informed me that using other tools outside what she was familiar not count towards my KPI’s specific to phone calls. I informed her my phone calls are not part of my KPI’s and stressed again the importance of my access to this tool. We ended the call without scheduling a time to connect again. Two days later, I received a phone call from a VP telling me that I was let go. In shock I had asked why – the explication provided was in reference to my phone conversation with her two days prior. What was explained to me didn’t match up with what had happened and what was startling was this – Addison Group didn’t want to hear my side of the story – I was let go before anyone asked me what had happened. After I had provided my side of the story to the VP – he explained to me that his hands were tied and could not do anything. With all do respect to the industry and anyone considering an opportunity with this organization, proceed with caution, as you will not have a voice in some circumstances, like I did.

2.0
Oct 15, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Generally a good group of people (in my office who enjoy each other's company) - A chance to meet and assist a hugely diverse group of clients and candidates - Solid support from support staff (L&D, internal administrative employees) - Good technical support resources (Linkedin Recruiter, etc.)

Cons

- Management matters. I can't speak for other teams, but my team went through a significant management change almost a year ago, and when it occurred, the resulting change(s) have yielded a recruiting team that has: A) shrank significantly (from about 15 to 7 in 9 months), B) been subject to short-cuts at critical junctures during the interview process, especially AT THE CLOSE of a deal (with the result of thousands upon thousands of billing dollars out the window); C) been subject to a stronger sense of fear and intimidation by the changes in said leadership. People on my team seem to dread coming to work than they did even a year ago. The attitudinal shift has largely been ignored by the higher-ups. Distressing? You bet. - Culture shift. Whereas in previous years saw frequent out-of-the-office team-building exercises and bonding in a variety of ways - so important in a team-oriented sales environment - 2019 has been the opposite. There are far fewer of these important engagements, and teams have generally become distrustful of each other as the face-time has shrank. - Work Experience by New Hires. AG has a whole has placed emphasis on hiring inexperienced recruiters generally fresh out of college - even in PERM! I'm certain it is done in an effort to undercut draws/salaries - ("let's take a 4-5 month chance on a 24-year-old with no recruiting experience; if it doesn't stick, meh..."). That seems to have been a shift over what has happened in years past. The result has been a churn-and-burn mentality with too many of these younger, inexperienced recruiters; I've seen many either get let go or leave prior to maturing in the craft. - WFH/Work Remote. It's 2019, folks. Work-from-Home/Work Remote options in this industry are proliferating. The AG corporate company line of "you'll never work as effectively from home as in the office" is total bunk. I've surveyed non-AG recruiters over the last few years who WFH/Remote; they've seen their work and craft focus sharper, have seen their billings increase, and enjoy the flexibility inherent in not being tied to a cube 5 days per week. AG needs to get on board that train, quickly, or they're going to sacrifice talent. And also.. - Draw v Commission. AG, like other old school agencies, offer only a Draw v Commission compensation structure. Many more progressive agencies recognize that to attract talent, you need to offer a BASE SALARY PLUS COMMISSION structure. The latter alleviates the bane of any perm recruiter working in an environment of the former; it's not only a psychological factor - that you're not constantly worrying about "being behind" on your draw - but it shows real faith in the agency that offers you a base salary that they're in it for the long haul with you; yes, you still need to produce - it's a sales environment - but it absolutely is a greater leap forward to offer a base versus a draw scheme. - Circus-like, bro-like culture. AG bullpens, on the whole, operate very much in a loud and boisterous environment. This is encouraged by certain managers, but they fail to realize, or simply don't care, HOW DISTRACTING this is to people who are committed to the process of making money (e.g. commitment to the phones, researching and strategizing on client and candidate outreach, etc.). Moreover, it's an environment that is hugely in to distracting, interjecting and long and unnecessary conversations about the "college football game Saturday" or "the Fantasy Football meeting". This all harkens back to the WFH/Work remote options I mentioned earlier...which should be an option across the board. In my experience, and others I've talked to, eliminating the distractions of loud, carnival-like explosions should be a priority. (Hello? WFH options!) In the end, I will say that most of the people I've known at Addison Group are good folks who generally *want* to earn the most they can. I think, however, it absolutely matters: 1) Who leads your department, 2) What the culture fosters, and 3) and the idiom by which a recruiter can truly flourish. Our type of sales environment is unique: we're dealing with and in people, not widgets. There are a ton of disappointments, but also some incredible highs; but because we are in the "people business", it has been my observation that AG has a long way to go in flexing and adapting to a changing landscape on how to do business effectively.

Viewing 205 - 207 of 1,041 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,263 Addison Group reviews submitted anonymously by Addison Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Addison Group is right for you.