employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Benchmark Electronics

Engaged Employer

Benchmark Electronics reviews

3.0

41% would recommend to a friend

(114 total reviews)

Jeff Benck

55% approve of CEO

39% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

114 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
3.0
Jul 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

4 day work week. Good production manager.

Cons

Low pay. Lazy engineering and lazy engineering mindset.

avatar
Benchmark Electronics Response
10mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience as a Manufacturing Technician in Santa Ana. We appreciate your candid feedback and your contributions during your time with Benchmark. We're glad to hear that you’ve had a positive experience with the 4-day work week and your production manager. We know how important leadership and work-life balance are, and it’s encouraging to hear that those aspects have made a difference for you. We also recognize your concerns around compensation and your observations about engineering collaboration. Feedback like yours helps us reflect on how we can better support our teams and foster a culture of accountability and continuous improvement—core values we strive to uphold every day. We’re actively investing in leadership development, employee engagement, and cross-functional collaboration to strengthen our workplace and ensure all voices are heard and valued. Your advice to value loyal employees more is especially appreciated. We genuinely care for our people and are committed to creating an environment where dedication is recognized and rewarded. Thank you again for your insights. We wish you continued success and encourage you to keep sharing feedback—it helps us grow.
2.0
Jul 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly Production Staff: Many production employees were respectful and enjoyable to work alongside, helping build a positive daily atmosphere. Work-Life Balance (Inspection Dept): The inspection department generally allowed for flexibility when requested, making it easier to manage personal commitments. Fair Starting Pay & Early Recognition: In the first couple of years, hard work was acknowledged with a promotion and raise, and early contributions felt appreciated. Access to Resources (Eventually): While access to tools, software, and workstations existed, it often took time or multiple requests—some employees started without basic equipment ready. Some Collaboration Between Teams: There were moments of solid teamwork between inspectors, engineers, and production, though this was inconsistent and highly dependent on individual willingness.

Cons

High Turnover in Leadership: Over the course of three years, I had three different direct supervisors, two department managers, and the site had four different General Managers. This constant change made it hard to maintain consistency or build long-term growth paths. Disorganized Priorities & Workflow: The company often struggled with setting clear priorities. Job releases, hot items, and engineering approvals were frequently rushed or delayed until the last minute, creating unnecessary pressure across departments. Lack of Proper Training: Onboarding was minimal or nonexistent. The standard direction was to “read the work instructions,” with little hands-on guidance. Supervisors often didn’t have enough technical knowledge to help and redirected questions to engineers. Poor Planning for New Hires: I personally didn’t have my own inspection station for over a year, and new employees were sometimes onboarded without a designated workspace on their first day. Favoritism & Unequal Opportunity: Advancement didn’t seem to follow experience or merit. Temps or employees with personal connections to supervisors were prioritized for promotions, while qualified long-term employees were overlooked. Unresolved Conflicts & Lack of Support: Issues were often dismissed or redirected. When I sought help, I was told “I can’t always be there to hold your hand.” That left me on my own to coordinate with engineers and leadership for solutions. Supervisor Behavior Shifted Over Time: Initial fairness gave way to inconsistent treatment, with noticeable differences in how employees were managed once the supervisor became more familiar with them. Communication Gaps Impacted Performance: Miscommunication around job urgency, hot parts, and shifting priorities led to wasted time and frustration—especially in inspection, where clarity is critical. Selective HR Follow-Up: HR only seemed to follow through on concerns raised by employees they were aligned with. For example, my request to transfer supervisors due to a hostile environment was ignored, and I was never interviewed for a lead role I applied for—despite qualifications. Fear Culture: Many employees were hesitant to speak up. Promotions or changes often only came when someone threatened to quit, and speaking out sometimes felt like it risked retaliation rather than resolution.

avatar
Benchmark Electronics Response
11mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We appreciate your contributions during your time at Benchmark and are grateful for the insights you’ve offered, both the positive aspects and the areas where we fell short. We’re glad to hear that you experienced early recognition, flexibility in your department, and strong relationships with your peers. At the same time, we’re deeply sorry to hear about the challenges you faced, particularly around leadership turnover, onboarding, and communication. Your feedback highlights areas where we must continue to grow. At Benchmark, we will continue investing in leadership development, improving onboarding processes, and fostering a culture where every employee feels supported and heard. We know that building trust takes time and consistency, and we’re working hard to ensure that’s reflected across all levels of the organization. Thank you again for your honesty and for the time you spent with us. We wish you all the best in your future endeavors.
2.0
Jun 18, 2025

,

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

eazy to obtain more networking

Cons

the salary is not the best

avatar
Benchmark Electronics Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience as a Consultant in our Dallas location. We’re glad to hear that you found value in the networking opportunities available at Benchmark—building strong professional relationships is something we truly believe supports both personal and organizational growth. We also appreciate your candid feedback regarding compensation. While we strive to offer competitive and fair compensation packages, we understand that expectations and experiences can vary. Your input is valuable and will be shared with our leadership and HR teams as we continue to evaluate how we support and retain our talent. At Benchmark we’re continuously learning and improving, and feedback like yours helps us do just that. Thank you again for your contributions to Benchmark and for helping us work toward our purpose: to innovate for a healthier, safer, and better-connected world. Wishing you continued success in your career. —The Benchmark Team
Viewing 10 - 12 of 114 Reviews

Glassdoor has 619 Benchmark Electronics reviews submitted anonymously by Benchmark Electronics employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Benchmark Electronics is right for you.