Blue Origin reviews

3.2

47% would recommend to a friend

(1,200 total reviews)

Dave Limp

34% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

Blue Origin has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 1,200 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Blue Origin employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Oct 2, 2019

Space Dystopia

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The original vision was inspiring - millions of people living and working in space - There are remnants of functional groups that achieved something in the past, during the reign of the old president ("small pockets of competence") - Funding appears to be unlimited (for now) - They do not seem to fire people easily, even if they mess up big

Cons

- Absence of ownership and accountability is a norm - Vast incompetence and inexperience (Blue is riddled with new grads and rejects from other aerospace companies) that hardly know what they are talking about, less what they are doing - Blame culture and high turnover - Arrogance and unreasonable optimism/bullishness are character traits of the majority of managers

2.0
Feb 23, 2019

Don't start your career here

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Bold vision -Employees are friendly, but no different from other workplaces I've experienced -You get to work on rockets

Cons

-Scaling way too quickly -Increasingly “Kool-Aid” Culture -Employees treated like pawns Blue Origin is my first engineering job out of school. If I were to assess the composition of the company, I’d say most senior employees and upper-level managers are ex-aerospace from other companies (Rockedyne, Boeing, ULA, etc.). Blue Origin offers an opportunity for these people to “do it right” by developing products at a new company without process pitfalls and overhead that characterize old aerospace. Arrogance abounds, as most of these individuals have very strong opinions of how the company should be run (perhaps justified). Consequently, it seems like most decisions have a battle for control or hidden agenda implicitly attached. I’ve struggled to find individuals at the company I consider to be honorable leaders, and a lot of them seem to be leaving. As a new employee, you get assigned to a project, and usually there’s a person on the team that Blue wants you to “emulate.” That person assigns you work. This is typical of how industry functions, and if you pair well with the team then there’s nothing wrong with the system. The problem is Blue is scaling so quickly that they pay little to no respect to career history and ambitions of employees. Unless you see and know exactly who you want to be at the company, you can end up in a corner where your job is to take the work off the plate of more senior employees without clear definition of how this helps you get where you want to go (because what you want doesn’t matter). Since the company is scaling so quickly, it’s really tough to find people without an agenda to seek out for career development advice. I’ve had 2 (perhaps going on 3) functional managers in the last year just from company restructuring, not job-performance related. For first time students out of school, I think you are be better off starting at a company like Aerojet, Boeing, ULA, or Lockheed. These companies may be “old aerospace” but they will give you a clear impression of what a functioning aerospace company looks like. Moreover, they have well-established and vetted career development and training programs to help you figure out what you actually want to do and how to get there. The one exception to this I can think of is if you're dead set on working on liquid rocket engines; if that is the case then Blue or SpaceX may be the right place. Blue will likely be here down the road and will still need people if you decide to jump ship from another company someday. Perhaps I’m naive, but friends who work at other aerospace companies in the Seattle area seem more satisfied with their careers right now, even though my job at Blue may “sound cooler”.

1.0
Aug 20, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some (very few) people really care both about the mission AND the people they work with.

Cons

Where to begin? -no kindness or caring for people-people are only seen as resources and they will be worked to the bone. -Amazon corporate culture maximized: cut throat, competitive, back-stabbing. -Indecisive leaders: proposals will be written under tight deadlines with false urgency only to be de-prioritized. -Lack of any meaningful infrastructure: it won’t just feel like a start up-there are so many process and system gaps even after 20+ years. -Unethical, knee jerk behavior is rewarded as having “bias for action”. Egos are so big and skill sets are so niche that tools and programs are misused with no repercussions. -It is a mistake to trust any people leader with your growth or career. You are only as good as your loyalty and ability to make said leaders look good. -Any feedback or push back will have negative consequences.

Viewing 64 - 66 of 1,200 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,374 Blue Origin reviews submitted anonymously by Blue Origin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Blue Origin is right for you.