Pros
I don’t typically write reviews on forums like this, but after reading so many one-sided and often misleading comments, I felt compelled to share a different point of view.
Yes, the company has faced its share of challenges in recent years—leadership changes, strategic missteps, and growing pains. That’s undeniable. But it’s also true that it remains a strong, forward-looking organization that genuinely values its people and has significant potential for growth.
Having been with the company for over a decade, I’ve seen a lot. And while everyone’s experience is unique, I think it’s overly simplistic—and frankly unfair—to pin every issue on the current CEO. He’s not cut from the same cloth as those who came before him, and that’s not a bad thing. He may not be warm and charismatic, but that doesn’t make him ineffective. On the contrary, he’s a highly intelligent leader who’s willing to take smart, calculated risks—risks that could well position us at the forefront of the industry in the years ahead.
No, this isn’t “old chatham” and in many ways, that’s a good thing. It’s evolving. And I, for one, am optimistic about where we’re headed.
Cons
There’s a noticeable weakness in leadership, both at the senior level and throughout mid-level management. The current decision-making process, which leans heavily on consensus and often involves input from those without direct stake in the outcome, is stifling high performers. Organizations thrive when empowered individuals are trusted to act—and held accountable for results.
Additionally, the lack of a flexible hybrid work model (such as a 3/2 structure) is becoming a serious talent risk. Without more adaptable policies, the company will likely continue to see attrition among strong performers and face increasing difficulty attracting top-tier candidates.
