EOG reviews

long hours and high expectations

EOG was once a strong organization with capable leadership and a culture that rewarded performance and talent. During my earlier tenure, opportunities were based on merit, and there was a clear path for growth. Unfortunately, over time, leadership changes shifted the culture. Hiring and advancement decisions appeared to move away from merit based evaluation and toward subjective criteria. Performance reviews and HR processes became increasingly inconsistent, with unclear standards and limited accountability at higher levels of leadership. For those seeking a workplace built on fairness, transparent leadership, and long-term development, I would encourage careful consideration of the current culture before accepting a role. Accountability at the top is inconsistent, advancement isn’t clearly defined and hiring and performance management no longer appear strictly merit driven. Employees should understand that HR functions primarily as a risk-management arm of the company, not as an advocate for individual staff.