employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

AIDS Healthcare Foundation

Engaged Employer

HIV outreach team and management - HIV Tester AIDS Healthcare Foundation Employee Review

1.0
Nov 17, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Dr. Portnoy is an amazing doctor and extremely funny! He takes time with each client and makes them feel good about themselves and shows that laughter is a great medicine! He is extremely knowledgeable.

Cons

Management and co workers care more about their status than fact. The HIV team falsifies numbers, Mobile testing doesn’t work more than 3 hours a day on the mobile unit, and could care less about the client. Testing goals are approximately 600 per month. There is no time to find out why people are putting themselves at risk. The team is misinformed an out the use of universal precautions and are putting their clients and staff at risk for blood related infections. Also, each client tested is a commission payment to the tester. So, each client tested isn’t even treated like a number, they are treated like another chunk added to the monthly paycheck. Staff is not properly trained. And management sees these problems, but does nothing to rectify the issues. I do not recommend sending clients here for care.

avatar
AIDS Healthcare Foundation Response
8y
Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback. We’d love learn more about your experience and how we can improve. Please email us at HR@aidshealth.org

Explore other reviews about AIDS Healthcare Foundation

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Collaborate with multidisciplinary team to provide the best care for our patients. Non-profit, great for PSLF. Competitive benefits and PTO.

Cons

Lower salary compared to market.

2.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A real sense that you’re doing something meaningful.

Cons

While the mission of the organization is admirable, the internal culture often undermined the work being done for vulnerable populations. Leadership turnover was constant, with management structures frequently changing and new supervisors appearing every few months. There were often multiple layers of management with unclear roles, creating confusion, competing priorities, and a workplace environment that felt more focused on internal politics than supporting staff. Many employees were deeply committed to the mission and routinely gave far more of themselves than was sustainable. I know I did. The workload and culture made it easy to lose any sense of work-life balance, and there was little meaningful support for the emotional toll of the work. What was most disheartening was watching an organization built to care for vulnerable people become, at times, one of the most difficult places for its own employees to feel valued and supported. The disconnect between the mission and the treatment of staff was significant. Several years later, I still recognize the impact that experience had on my professional confidence and overall well-being.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All