Identity Crisis - Anonymous Employee FloQast Employee Review

1.0
Apr 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are fairly standard. Some flexibility existed previously, but the company has moved away from remote work.

Cons

FloQast has lost a lot of the identity and momentum that once made it feel like a standout company. The product is inconsistent and often does not perform reliably, which is especially concerning for a platform positioned toward enterprise customers. The company also appears to be behind competitors in terms of innovation, and leadership tends to be reactive rather than strategic. Culture is another major challenge. While company values are frequently discussed in all-hands meetings, they often do not reflect the day-to-day employee experience. Concerns around turnover and retention have been raised repeatedly, but leadership has not shown meaningful urgency in addressing them. Feedback is often met with responses implying the company “isn’t for everyone,” rather than a willingness to improve. Additionally, there are ongoing concerns around fairness and career growth. There is still a noticeable “boys club” dynamic, and internal mobility and promotions do not always feel transparent or equitable. In many cases, roles appear to be filled without giving all employees a fair opportunity to be considered. Overall, the company would benefit from stronger leadership, more accountability, and a greater focus on valuing and retaining employees.

Explore other reviews about FloQast

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people to work with. Great product.

Cons

I can't think of any

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent benefits, some great people

Cons

Leadership has actively driven this company into the ground. Since the layoffs in 2024 (and countless silent layoffs since), engineering culture has been in freefall, and it keeps getting worse. Attrition is sky-high, and the CTO keeps stacking leadership with his own friends — people who know nothing about the job and default to threatening people’s jobs to compensate. The constant churn means institutional knowledge just walks out the door on a regular basis, leaving teams full of people who don’t actually understand the systems they’re responsible for. QA has been gutted to the point of being nearly nonexistent, so defects ship constantly and nobody catches them until customers do — made worse by a QA manager who’s notorious for threatening everyone’s job security while doing none of the actual work himself, spending his days on his phone instead. Deadlines materialize out of nowhere, driven entirely by leadership’s whims rather than any actual planning. Fire drills happen daily. Every one of the CTO’s initiatives has failed, and there’s zero accountability for any of it. The product org isn’t far behind. The heads of product and engineering apparently don’t speak to each other, which leaves everyone else scrambling to fill the gap and coordinate work that should’ve been aligned from the top. The SVP of Product is condescending to the point where it has caused attrition. Leadership keeps inserting itself further into product decisions despite having no real read on what users actually want — they’re clearly more interested in how things look than whether the product actually works.

23
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All