employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Kestra Financial

Is this your company?

Changes are happening, but not the ones needed - Anonymous employee Kestra Financial Employee Review

1.0
Apr 6, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Occasionally, breakfast or lunch would be provided and some management individuals work to bring some reward to the team. The people I worked with are amazing and deserving of every praise. They make work worth it

Cons

Where to start?: - work/life balance: If you're looking for a role where you can leave at the end of the day, this is not the place for you. Brokerage Accounts specialist frequently have opportunities for "overtime". Sometimes it's optional but there are "strong suggestions" to work, especially when the onboarding team brings on multiple new advisors with promises that cannot be delivered due to understaffing. Concierge (the phone team) is overworked and understaffed. The position deviates from a typical call center in that you're responsible for calls, the follow up work to solve issues from those calls, emails from advisors, and everything else that other departments say isn't their job and won't touch (special projects). Most of concierge has to come in 1-2 hours early or stay late to even keep up. - Communication: Nobody talks to anyone. If Compliance is changing policy to comply with new SEC/FINRA regulations, the service teams are the last to know. When management makes changes to technology, the services teams (you know, the people using the systems daily) are asked for input that is NEVER used. For example, when the new NAO system went online in March 2017, members of the service teams tested the system and pointed out errors and inefficiencies weeks/months in advance. But management went through with the rollout that resulted in paperwork not being processed and submitted to the custodian for 2-3 weeks. What about policy changes that affect advisors? Instead of sending out mass communication to the field on paperwork policy change, some of management decided to inform advisors of policy change by just flat out denying paperwork in the system messages. If all else fails or you have any questions? Call Concierge. Even if they haven't been informed, they're still supposed to know. - Micromanagement: This is why everyone is leaving. Everyone in Concierge is scheduled to 15 minute intervals. Clock in, 8 AM. You get two 15 minute breaks and one 30 minute lunch. If it's not your scheduled time to be off, you'd better be on the phone or you'll get multiple messages from upper management asking where you are and reminding you what you should be doing. Stick to your phone calls, stick to your phone scripts. Are you just off the phone and wrapping up post call work and follow up? Nope, save it for when you're off the clock because that phone call has been holding for 20 seconds and it's a disservice to the advisors. What if you've got an important issue to take care of and escalate to management or need to report a technology bug that affects the entire system? Nope, the next phone call is more important. - Severely understaffed: For all the years I was there, the company was always understaffed. First the Account Services teams went through change and for a little over two months 1-2 people left every week in early 2017. An offshore team was added in India about 2 years ago but they've only recently received more in depth training to get them running efficiently. Concierge phone teams weren't equipped to handle high call volumes at a working team of 18 in December. So the plan was to hire at least 2 more spots to help. Well since the second week of January, 8 people have left that department due to promotions within the company, being fired, or leaving the company altogether and nowhere near that amount have been hired to replace them. What makes matters worse is that every one of those people had at least 1.5 years of experience or more and familiarity with the business, platforms, and established rapport with the advisors - The customer is always right: I've seen cases where an advisor will complain until management grants special permission for advisors to get away with exceptions that do not follow policy. If you grant exceptions to every advisor that complains, is it really an exception any more? Wouldn't it be more efficient to visit and consider a change of policy if that's the case? If you're wondering why you haven't heard of these inefficiencies, believe me when I say that they've been addressed. But everyone is too busy putting out fires that these issues aren't addressed. Those on the phones hear the complaints almost daily but are tired of reporting them because nothing changes. So why bother reporting any more? - Technology: Advisor Complete works ok when it works. When it doesn't (maybe 1-2 times a month on average), it's pretty awful and the call volumes spike accordingly. It takes forever to approve communication to the field letting advisors and staff know the system isn't down. It takes technology as quickly as a few minutes or as long as half a day to fix the issues. Until then those taking the calls and processing just had to find workarounds to get things done. Technology issues were more prevalent in 2017 but seem to have gone down for the most part. Except eSign. Something or another seems to be off with the eSign system.

Explore other reviews about Kestra Financial

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is a solid place to work if you want to get into tech or wealth management in Austin. They are hiring a lot right now to build out the tech platform that the financial advisors use. You get to see how the wealth management industry works from the inside and work on technology that directly impacts advisors, which gives you good experience. Everyone I work with is professional and handles their business.

Cons

It is financial services, so there is standard corporate red tape and compliance rules you have to deal with.

1.0
Apr 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I did not find any meaningful advantages working at this company. It feels quite average - nothing that stands out positively compared to others in the industry - while the downsides are significant and consistent.

Cons

The corporate culture here strongly rewards blind loyalty over actual results and performance. If you value your time, self-respect, and real opportunities for professional growth, this may not be the right place for you. Many of the positive reviews appear to have been submitted under pressure from management. They tend to be vague and generic ("great team," "keep up the good work"). In contrast, the negative reviews consistently describe the same serious issues, with details that are too specific and repetitive to be fabricated. Key concerns include: 1. Lack of proper onboarding and training. 2. Outdated technologies and processes (with only a few minor exceptions). 3. Middle management that blindly follows directives from above without understanding or being able to explain the "why" to their teams. 4. Extremely rigid office policy: 4 days in the office per week with very limited remote flexibility. Working from home is generally not allowed even if you're sick or need to visit family in another city for a couple of weeks. 5. On top of that, the company uses ActivTrak software to monitor employee activity. This, combined with the strict in-office requirements, creates a toxic micromanagement environment - your manager (and the software) decide whether you're being "productive," regardless of your actual output or results. Overall, the combination of these factors creates a frustrating environment for anyone who wants autonomy and trust in how they deliver their work.

14
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All