employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Kestra Financial

Is this your company?

Kestra Financial reviews

2.2

24% would recommend to a friend

(180 total reviews)
avatar

James Poer

24% approve of CEO

26% positive business outlook

Kestra Financial has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 180 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Kestra Financial employee rating is 41% below average for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

180 reviews
2.0
Jan 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For those of us that love to solve complex problems in a fractal business model, with net-new, deeply impactful projects and initiatives occurring constantly, Kestra is a perfect bride. Kestra certainly isn't "realizing" it's scale, but more so realizing how much it's scaled and just beginning to make some pivots necessary to deal with it. The company, as it's portrayed by senior leadership, is a massive success and continues to be competitive in the independent BD/RIA space. If their recruiting continues to thrive, and its debt remains right-size, they'll easily survive even the worst of market swings. Holdings have almost doubled in ~3 years, and no matter what anyone's feelings about Kestra are, you cannot argue with those numbers. If you are a fiend for hard work, tremendously resilient, and want the opportunity to own parts of the company's business that may be above your pay grade and at the forward edge of your talent, put your helmet on and step into the arena. You will receive a militaristic business education here, to put it mildly. There are countless opportunities to work closely with cross functional teams and business partners - and make no mistake - you will become close to these people, personally and professionally. More than 5 of my colleagues have become, and will be, lifelong friends. Chronic, sustained chaos isn’t healthy, but I didn’t come here to eat kale and sing kumbaya.

Cons

Oh boy... *cracks knuckles* Kestra current state is such a delicious case study, Harvard MBA candidates would enthusiastically snort its compounded complexities off the surface of a dive bar toilet tank. There is very little overarching strategic vision to guide the business forward, and truthfully, that’s not totally the fault of the current leadership. The company has doubled down on acquisitions of other seasoned businesses to grow its product offering instead of deep diving into low-hanging fruit… Kestra Financial is hogtied to its poor technology, which continues to plague both internal and external users. The design and engineering decisions made by long-gone contributors have prepared a sacrificial altar for associates and leaders alike. The pay is sub-par across all channels, and when you have significant tech debt, you must rapidly recruit the savant-level developers that we all know are out there. Kestra hasn’t accepted this as a solution, and for what reason I still don’t know. Countless, $multi-million initiatives have fallen flat and instead of investing that capital into sustainable long-term fixes, Kestra has under hired, undercompensated, and undermanaged. Unfortunately, even if Kestra were able to locate, convince, hire, and salary these elite employees, they wouldn’t be able to retain them due to the culture, or lack thereof. The company refuses to reward the employees they underpay and overwork. Whereas weeklong client incentive trips are expertly hosted in luxury destinations, Kestra employees are granted two drink tickets at a trashy bar and event space connected to a movie theater from 4-7pm on a Wednesday night for the annual “Christmas Party”. There’s no artful way to say it: it’s a slap in the face. If you’re green to plan for the quarter, you’re rewarded with a burger… Employees attend annual employee anniversary lunches with the CEO and President, which are notorious for their tendency to turn aggressive and combatant without warning. No effort is made to engage the employees in a truly impactful way. There isn’t much I dislike more than a lack of integrity, and that’s what has become the norm at Kestra. Years where we triumphed in topline revenue and lapped our plan, the legendary “Sweep Accounts” robbed those that were looking forward to their well-earned bonuses. It may have been true, but no one paid the price for that gaffe and certainly no one apologized. The employees do not trust upper management or decision makers. The only healthy culture that exists is only because of the love and appreciation shown by those who carry the banner, not for the company, but for those who truly care about our team. It’s a terribly toxic soup, and Kestra’s employees are A-grade ingredients stuck in a rolling boil. The only thing Kestra cares about is shareholder value. Seasoned, valued executives survive personal hells of interpersonal demoralization and degradation from top leadership in the hope they can make it until the next recap. The downstream effects of these unacceptable behaviors are severe and paralyze leaders in a devastating domino effect. The size of the internal shareholder group at the company is miniscule. You will not get equity if you join. But don’t get it twisted, being an outsider to this small group of equity holders does not shelter you from degradation. The CEO is a once-in-a-generation M&A and corporate finance genius – honestly, when it comes to balancing interests between capital partners/shareholders, creditors, and market risks, the guy is a blue genie. His struggles to relate, edify, and celebrate the people who care about his life’s work as much as he does is a monumental disappointment. His disposition is characterological. There is no true marketable differentiation between Kestra and its competitors, and therefore the satisfaction and retention of clients is the only thing that matters, regardless of how farfetched or absurd an escalation or complaint may be. The ability to call the President or Chiefs at any moment for any reason is the only real perk Kestra can offer, but it diminishes the client service model’s effectiveness and renders Kestra helpless to hold the professionals they serve accountable for operating high-quality businesses. True scale is futile.

1.0
Oct 28, 2019

Fake reviews

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Like all of the real reviews say, the only pro is the nice building and the cost is definitely coming out of your paycheck.

Cons

Do you notice how there are multiple reviews all titled "Great company" that don't list any cons? These are fake reviews. I recently left after working there 3 years and I can verify that the company is posting fake reviews to try to repair their image. Anyone with a lick of sense could see through it, but I just want to verify that these are absolutely illegitimate. Completely irreptuable company and I can't recommend enough that you be wary. If you must take a job there, use'em and lose'em. There's a reason they keep getting fined by Finra as well.

1.0
Apr 6, 2018

Changes are happening, but not the ones needed

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Occasionally, breakfast or lunch would be provided and some management individuals work to bring some reward to the team. The people I worked with are amazing and deserving of every praise. They make work worth it

Cons

Where to start?: - work/life balance: If you're looking for a role where you can leave at the end of the day, this is not the place for you. Brokerage Accounts specialist frequently have opportunities for "overtime". Sometimes it's optional but there are "strong suggestions" to work, especially when the onboarding team brings on multiple new advisors with promises that cannot be delivered due to understaffing. Concierge (the phone team) is overworked and understaffed. The position deviates from a typical call center in that you're responsible for calls, the follow up work to solve issues from those calls, emails from advisors, and everything else that other departments say isn't their job and won't touch (special projects). Most of concierge has to come in 1-2 hours early or stay late to even keep up. - Communication: Nobody talks to anyone. If Compliance is changing policy to comply with new SEC/FINRA regulations, the service teams are the last to know. When management makes changes to technology, the services teams (you know, the people using the systems daily) are asked for input that is NEVER used. For example, when the new NAO system went online in March 2017, members of the service teams tested the system and pointed out errors and inefficiencies weeks/months in advance. But management went through with the rollout that resulted in paperwork not being processed and submitted to the custodian for 2-3 weeks. What about policy changes that affect advisors? Instead of sending out mass communication to the field on paperwork policy change, some of management decided to inform advisors of policy change by just flat out denying paperwork in the system messages. If all else fails or you have any questions? Call Concierge. Even if they haven't been informed, they're still supposed to know. - Micromanagement: This is why everyone is leaving. Everyone in Concierge is scheduled to 15 minute intervals. Clock in, 8 AM. You get two 15 minute breaks and one 30 minute lunch. If it's not your scheduled time to be off, you'd better be on the phone or you'll get multiple messages from upper management asking where you are and reminding you what you should be doing. Stick to your phone calls, stick to your phone scripts. Are you just off the phone and wrapping up post call work and follow up? Nope, save it for when you're off the clock because that phone call has been holding for 20 seconds and it's a disservice to the advisors. What if you've got an important issue to take care of and escalate to management or need to report a technology bug that affects the entire system? Nope, the next phone call is more important. - Severely understaffed: For all the years I was there, the company was always understaffed. First the Account Services teams went through change and for a little over two months 1-2 people left every week in early 2017. An offshore team was added in India about 2 years ago but they've only recently received more in depth training to get them running efficiently. Concierge phone teams weren't equipped to handle high call volumes at a working team of 18 in December. So the plan was to hire at least 2 more spots to help. Well since the second week of January, 8 people have left that department due to promotions within the company, being fired, or leaving the company altogether and nowhere near that amount have been hired to replace them. What makes matters worse is that every one of those people had at least 1.5 years of experience or more and familiarity with the business, platforms, and established rapport with the advisors - The customer is always right: I've seen cases where an advisor will complain until management grants special permission for advisors to get away with exceptions that do not follow policy. If you grant exceptions to every advisor that complains, is it really an exception any more? Wouldn't it be more efficient to visit and consider a change of policy if that's the case? If you're wondering why you haven't heard of these inefficiencies, believe me when I say that they've been addressed. But everyone is too busy putting out fires that these issues aren't addressed. Those on the phones hear the complaints almost daily but are tired of reporting them because nothing changes. So why bother reporting any more? - Technology: Advisor Complete works ok when it works. When it doesn't (maybe 1-2 times a month on average), it's pretty awful and the call volumes spike accordingly. It takes forever to approve communication to the field letting advisors and staff know the system isn't down. It takes technology as quickly as a few minutes or as long as half a day to fix the issues. Until then those taking the calls and processing just had to find workarounds to get things done. Technology issues were more prevalent in 2017 but seem to have gone down for the most part. Except eSign. Something or another seems to be off with the eSign system.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 180 Reviews

Glassdoor has 208 Kestra Financial reviews submitted anonymously by Kestra Financial employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Kestra Financial is right for you.