Blended case manager - Case Manager Merakey Employee Review

2.0
Dec 29, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The positive aspects of this job are few and far between. However, if you want to make a difference in the lives of people who struggle with mental illness it is a great platform. It also is pretty flexible as far as the hours go and you can arrange (depending on supervisor) you schedule to fit your needs--especially if you are in graduate school as almost all of the case managers are. Reimbursement at $0.40 a mile for travel.

Cons

Upper management does their best to discourage the formation of a strong Union despite everyone being a member. The union in bucks county is much stronger and the case managers there start at 18.21 and hour so that 3 dollar difference does add up especially as there is no overtime and only a 37.5 hour week. Base pay is around 820.00$ every two weeks which does not cut it for people with student loan debt. Performance based on productivity which relies on people with mental health issues being consistent. If your schedule gets messed up due to a client canceling it can be very difficult to recover. Essentially they require 4.5 hours a day doing something directly with or for your clients. You can not bill for travel and the software used for writing your "progress notes" has a habit of crashing.

Explore other reviews about Merakey

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Cons

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Cons

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All