Awesome company to work - Software Enginnner PassiveLogic Employee Review

5.0
Jan 19, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work culture and work life balance is good.

Cons

Over all good, It is a great Company.

avatar
PassiveLogic Response
2y
PassiveLogic is at the extreme of high performing startups. We have high standards of accountability, and it’s not an environment for everyone. We hire people from all kinds of backgrounds, including traditional industry. Sometimes folks are challenged to jump the chasm from traditional industry to the deep technology industry. Our culture is exceptionally people-centric, giving our people opportunities to stretch and grow. At the same time, we practice good governance, and therefore we sometimes must let people go when they aren’t aligned with the company’s vision. The author’s discussion of Open Building Control shows that they don’t fundamentally understand PassiveLogic’s technology or business and it’s the reason they are not on the team anymore. While our people ops team approaches these situations with grace, understandably the dismissed employee is not always happy about the outcome. The company is on exactly the same path today as when it was founded. PassiveLogic is building an unprecedented ecosystem that expands the limits of technology, innovates new approaches to UI/UX, and rethinks convention when it comes to commercialization. Our vision extends beyond conventional building controls. These big goals require cohesive vision across domains, as well as cross-functional team unity. PassiveLogic’s CEO guides this singular vision, informed by his deep domain expertise across design, technology, building science, finance, and business to lead each area of the company in a deeply principled way.

Explore other reviews about PassiveLogic

5.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This is one of the most unique professional experiences I’ve had. The company was built around a very ambitious vision for physical AI, autonomy, and real-world systems. I came to work here for Troy Harvey's vision and principled approach to design. It was inspiring to work with him, and the mission drove me to work hard to achieve amazing things. I hope to continue to work with him in the future. What stood out most was the ability to connect hardware, software, AI, product, and customer value into one coherent direction. That kind of systems-level genius is rare. And his type of leadership uniquely collaborative leadership hard to come by. The work was meaningful because it felt like we were building something genuinely new, and we were doing it together as a team with a set of focused goals. The best part of the culture was the exposure to big ideas and high expectations. If you wanted to grow, learn, and be challenged, there was a lot of opportunity.

Cons

The pace and expectations are intense. Communication could sometimes move quickly if you aren't paying attention because the company and the ideas were operating at a high level of complexity.

2
4.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

With Troy no longer in the CEO role, the company needs to prove that it can preserve what made it special. His absence will be felt, especially in the areas of vision, customer-market coherence, cross-org technical depth, and the ability to bring out the best in people. The company feels at best in search of direction and leadership without him. Troy was the kind of founder people join a company to work with. He had a rare ability to imagine what the world could become and then rally people around that future. He was a visionary systems thinker, but what made him especially effective was that he was also a team orchestrator. He could see how different people’s skills, instincts, and experiences fit together, often before they saw it themselves. That encouraged people do some of the best work of their careers. The company’s ambition came from that combination: huge technical vision, high standards, and a real belief in people. It created a culture where people were asked to stretch, but also where the work felt connected to a larger purpose.

Cons

This isn’t con per se. I’ve read some of the (curious) complaints below. These are self describing: Troy didn’t suffer fools. He was incredibly open to discuss, collaborate, and mentor. Sometimes it was a paradigm shift you had invest intellectual rigor to fully understand. But once you got it 🤯. You were always given many chances — probably too many. But if you were lazy, or didn’t put the intellectual effort, he would move on or replace you. As it should be.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All