Great Environment - Regional Manager Right At School Employee Review

4.0
Jan 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great home office team - most of the people are collaborative and willing to support. The vision of the organization is something to be proud of. When we get it right we get it RIGHT.

Cons

High stress - lack of operational procedures. Often having to wear the hat of sales, HR, finance, and tech. There are departments that support those areas but often it's only 2-3 people covering the entire organization. Makes it hard to have a high level strategic vision without having to work 60-80 hour weeks.

Explore other reviews about Right At School

5.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule and clear training provided prior to start date.

Cons

Occasionally, minor communication errors would occur.

avatar
Right At School Response
3w
Hello, this is Michelle from Right at School. Thank you so much for your kind words! We’re really glad to hear that the scheduling flexibility and training have been positives for you. Helping our team members feel confident and supported from day one is something we work hard to achieve. We also really appreciate your feedback regarding communication. Even small communication gaps can make a difference and we are always looking for ways to improve how we support our teams. If you ever have additional feedback to share, don’t hesitate to reach out to me at michelle.keene@rightatschool.com. Thank you!
1.0
Jul 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Opportunity to gain early childhood education experience.

Cons

* Poor hours with little flexibility. * Extremely high turnover due to inadequate training and lack of support. * Toxic, cliquey work environment. * Program managers and some shift leads were unsupportive and often made staff feel suffocated. * Educators received little meaningful support while being expected to manage chaotic programs. * Inconsistent quality of coworkers; some displayed unprofessional behavior around children. * Upper management was dishonest or unclear about payroll, expectations, and available support. * Low staff morale negatively affected parents’ perception of the company. * Frequent micromanagement instead of coaching or mentorship. * Communication from some managers was often condescending, aggressive, or focused only on mistakes. * Management rarely checked in to offer help, instead focusing on criticism. * Some leadership styles escalated children’s emotional situations rather than de-escalating them. * Certain managers appeared quick to assume children were acting maliciously instead of understanding the situation. * Overall culture left staff feeling undervalued, uncomfortable, and unsupported. * Lack of investment in employee development and long-term success. * Poor leadership contributed to burnout and made retention difficult. * There was an employee with a dangerous criminal record that went unnoticed by management for some time.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All