Great products, horrible leadership. - Sales Executive Storable Employee Review

2.0
Mar 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The position can be done from home.

Cons

The leadership is unfortunately ill-equipped to perform their roles. They didn't understand the products, the systems used, or the client focus, which makes it hard to learn from people that know less than you do. Plus, the commission structure changed with the season. Every time someone made a very large commission on a product, they lessened the commission for the next time so you'd never make that same amount again. I really thought this was a great company to work for and quickly saw behind the curtain. I would not recommend this company to anyone looking for growth, as they also do not give annual raises to any of the support staff. Imagine making the same amount you made 5 years ago, even though the company has grown at least 6 times.

avatar
Storable Response
1y
Thank you for your feedback. We'd like to clarify that Storable conducts regular compensation reviews for all staff. While our commission structure is designed to align with both individual and company performance, we’re always evaluating it to ensure fairness and competitiveness.

Explore other reviews about Storable

5.0
Dec 15, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leading products in the space and strong leadership in Sales, Marketing and Product.

Cons

None that come to mind

2.0
Apr 3, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong onboarding experience and initial support from leadership Clear expectations and alignment during the first few months Positive, collaborative team environment early on Opportunity to learn and grow in a fast-paced environment Supportive culture prior to leadership changes

Cons

Significant decline in overall team experience after leadership transition Director stepped into the role without direct experience in the function, leading to gaps in effective management Leadership initially presented as supportive, but this did not reflect long-term behavior or management style Constant and frequent changes to priorities, expectations, and processes, creating instability and lack of structure Efforts to remain adaptable, positive, and supportive during ongoing changes felt taken advantage of rather than recognized Inconsistent and contradictory feedback — verbal feedback was consistently positive, while written documentation did not align Lack of clarity around performance expectations, making it difficult to understand what success looked like Noticeable shift in management behavior and communication over time, particularly toward the end of tenure Concerns around being managed out rather than being supported or developed Attempt to initiate a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) that broadly covered the entire scope of responsibilities, rather than specific, actionable areas for improvement Misalignment between day-to-day performance feedback and formal performance concerns raised Perceived favoritism toward newer team members, specifically white male employees Observed comments and behaviors that felt culturally insensitive, particularly in reference to offshore (India-based) team members, creating concerns around inclusivity and respect Overall lack of transparency, consistency, and equitable treatment in performance management

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All