Toxic software development environment - IT Worker UnitedLex Employee Review

1.0
Mar 3, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The team has extremely high potential where nearly all work at a high level. Generally congenial work environment, with a few extreme caveats

Cons

Mushroom management. One particularly inept lead that causes not only chaos within projects but actually manages to break down the working relationships of people out around him. He's even went so far as to be outright sexually inappropriate on numerous occasions both to current employees and to applicants Absolutely no sense of clear direction, purpose or goals Bulk majority of workload being carried by a very few. Poor planning prior to beginning projects No expectation of success due to unpredictability of basic software development and deployment actions and no processes that are actively adhered to The sense that many projects are bridges to nowhere Constant procrastination and excuses surrounding resolving problems to move forward. 'Well, we need to have time to do that' - you don't get time you make time. Vague promises that 'good things are going to happen soon' but even after hush-hush meetings with management, HR, etc nothing appears to be actually happening - other than more dissension and greater animosity building among team members that would otherwise work fabulously together. Leads seem to spend more time squabbling than doing their jobs leaving a vacuum of responsibility that has to be filled - which in turn ends up in additional 'pseudo' leads being drawn into the squabbling.

Explore other reviews about UnitedLex

5.0
Feb 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very smart people - dynamic

Cons

None that I can think of

1
2.0
Jul 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great exposure to complex workflows and demanding, client facing work. The work is remote, which can arguably be seen as a positive. If treated as a stepping stone role or position, an associate's time here can be fruitful and lead to excellent opportunities down the line.

Cons

The organization leaves too much to be desired. Senior management is detached from the feedback shared by the staff; there seems to be a lack of concrete direction for the whole organization; and Managing Directors and above will openly state that "the organization pays below market rate, but staff should know that and be comfortable with that fact." Large initiatives are started and abandoned in the course of months, while senior leadership struggles sharing cohesive messages within the organization. In the time I spent there, I witnessed several massive shifts in senior leadership, with some of the most seasoned leaders leaving. There was a revolving door of staff members coming and going, and the same can be said of the senior leadership, which is often a deeply troubling sign. There was also a decided lack of clarity in roles. Often, multiple individuals would share the same responsibilities, while at other times, no one would have exact clarity who was responsible for other tasks. Senior leadership valued associates' likelihood of retention over skill-set such that individuals who were less-than-able to perform would be seen as assets, while capable, skilled team members would be over-looked during end of year review. Finally, the client management team would not take into account the feedback of the front line staff, thus over-promising and often under-delivering to the clients, leading to pain-points and frustration both within and without the organization.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All