FloQast reviews

2.9

40% would recommend to a friend

(58 total reviews)

Michael Whitmire

56% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

58 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Apr 27, 2026

Deeply demoralizing environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

No positive things about it, at all.

Cons

The environment is toxic, and deeply demoralizing. The new CTO (Sri) is responsible for building a new overseas office, but the overseas team performs extremely poorly. Some folks who were given high titles try to suppress this fact and protect Sri (CTO). If you speak up and raise concerns, you're the problem, not them. Some weird stuff is going on behind the scenes.

1.0
Apr 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

FloQast can give engineers the opportunity to work on challenging problems.

Cons

Leadership direction feels disconnected from both customer feedback and the day-to-day challenges employees face. Instead, priorities often have a sudden shift toward initiatives that appear driven more by trends or technical interests. The quantity and scale of these initiatives pull resources away from impactful work, create widespread setbacks due to little testing upon rollout, and ultimately result in something that feels like a step backwards. While there is no shortage of negative feedback on this direction, leadership often presents these initiatives as successful. As a result, providing candid feedback can feel risky and opportunities to do so seem to have decreased over time. The compounding number of contentious initiatives, combined with the difficulty of providing feedback on them, has left the company feeling divided. Newer employees, who have often joined specifically to execute on this direction, tend to be aligned with it but often lack context on the field. Meanwhile, more tenured employees often appear quietly critical of the direction, as their earlier concerns went unheard and are excluded from shaping it. As these sides grow further apart, it increasingly feels like large changes and disregard for issues are pushing tenured employees out, whether intentional or not. Attrition in existing teams seems high, and it appears that little is being done to address it, all while a large number of new hires are dedicated to the contentious initiatives. Regardless of which team you’re on, either the relentless push for new initiatives, limited resources, or increased expectations from AI appear to be driving longer hours and adding pressure. Furthermore, there is a sense that an RTO is coming, as employees close to offices are now heavily encouraged to go in and many new hires are no longer remote. Finally, pay and promotion opportunities feel limited, with compensation that feels below market. As new, more senior hires are brought in, I expect this problem could get worse.

1.0
Mar 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Decent people and alright benefits

Cons

- Terrible / Non-Existent cross-team communication - Leadership has no understanding of the teams and wonders why there is attrition and low morale - People are slow and demotivated due to poor management - Promises made by leadership are never kept - Offshoring and Silent Layoffs - Zero communication about GA/Release Process - Stagnant Career Progression - Below-average pay for tech - No 401k match - Focus on AI clouds the work and will lead to defects once turnover reaches a certain point to where they aren't caught early enough

Viewing 7 - 9 of 58 Reviews

Glassdoor has 317 FloQast reviews submitted anonymously by FloQast employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FloQast is right for you.