GAF reviews

3.1

54% would recommend to a friend

(561 total reviews)
avatar

John Altmeyer

38% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

GAF has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 561 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The GAF employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

561 reviews
1.0
Mar 21, 2025

Awful company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Racist company no pros at all

Cons

Management abuses power, cannot manage and don’t know their stuff . HR sucks too doesn’t help people and slow at replying . No career advancement as well , no promotions , horrible pay !

avatar
GAF Response
1y
We're very sorry to hear you feel this way. We value our employees, and this is not the experience we want you to have. We welcome you to share your thoughts by contacting our Compliance Hotline at 1-866-890-4450 or by visiting https://secure.ethicspoint.com/domain/media/en/gui/68599/index.html. Your thoughts can be submitted anonymously if you choose.
1.0
Mar 21, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the best parts of working here has been the incredible team. My coworkers are talented, hardworking, and truly supportive of one another. The collaboration and camaraderie within the team have made this a great place to work, and I genuinely enjoy working alongside them. However, with this sudden change in office requirements, I worry that many of them will choose to leave. It would be disappointing to see such an amazing group of people break apart due to a decision that could have been avoided.

Cons

The decision to increase mandatory office days from three to four is a major disruption to employees’ work-life balance. Many of us have structured our routines around the three-day requirement, and forcing an extra day in the office removes the flexibility that has allowed employees to stay productive while managing personal responsibilities. This change creates additional financial stress, particularly for parents—especially single parents—who now have to adjust their childcare arrangements, deal with longer commutes, and take on added expenses they weren’t expecting. With the rising cost of living, employees will now have to budget for higher transportation, childcare, and other costs associated with an extra day in the office. While this company offers competitive pay, these added expenses still create an unnecessary burden that could have been avoided by keeping the current schedule. Additionally, this decision feels like a bait-and-switch for newer employees. Many people accepted jobs here under the assumption that the company was committed to a 3-2 hybrid model. How can a company say one thing during the hiring process and then change the terms once employees are already committed? This kind of inconsistency erodes trust and can make employees question leadership’s transparency and decision-making. On top of that, this move directly contradicts the company’s goal of fostering a positive culture. A strong culture isn’t built by forcing people into the office more—it comes from trust, flexibility, and respecting employees’ needs. Many employees are unhappy with this change, and some are already considering leaving. If that happens, the remaining employees will be overworked, leading to burnout and further dissatisfaction. The CEO does not seem to recognize that many successful companies continue to thrive with remote or flexible work arrangements, and this unnecessary shift feels out of touch with modern workforce expectations. Employee morale will take a significant hit because leadership is not considering the realities of today’s world. The pandemic permanently changed how people approach work, and instead of adapting, this company is choosing to move backward.

avatar
GAF Response
1y
We understand that shifts in workplace expectations can be challenging, and we’re committed to supporting our employees through this transition. Our move to a 4:1 in-office schedule reflects our belief in the power of in-person collaboration to drive innovation, connection, and long-term success. While the policy will remain in place, we’re actively working on ways to make the in-office experience as productive and positive as possible, and we welcome ongoing dialogue to help us do that well. While we may not be able to address every concern immediately, your feedback is an important part of our ongoing conversations about how we work together.
1.0
Mar 21, 2025

Removing WFH

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Coworkers are great. Decent amount of learning opportunities.

Cons

It is extremely disappointing that the CEO has decided to start removing work from home days. At a time when there is a national housing crisis, many people cannot afford to live within close proximity to the Parsippany HQ. Removing WFH days greatly reduces work/life balance, and increases costs in employees' daily lives. Company morale is dropping quickly.

avatar
GAF Response
1y
We understand that shifts in workplace expectations can be challenging, and we’re committed to supporting our employees through this transition. Our move to a 4:1 in-office schedule reflects our belief in the power of in-person collaboration to drive innovation, connection, and long-term success. While the policy will remain in place, we’re actively working on ways to make the in-office experience as productive and positive as possible, and we welcome ongoing dialogue to help us do that well. We value your contributions and experience with our organization, and we know that adapting to workplace changes takes time.
Viewing 73 - 75 of 561 Reviews

Glassdoor has 658 GAF reviews submitted anonymously by GAF employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GAF is right for you.