Goldman Sachs reviews

3.7

66% would recommend to a friend

(19,416 total reviews)
avatar

David M. Solomon

63% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Goldman Sachs has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 19,416 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Goldman Sachs employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

19K reviews
1.0
Jul 8, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

prestige that comes with the name good on resume people 'think' you make tons of money you don't need to explain where you work once you just say the name

Cons

The prestige is really just a facade- If you work on their proprietary programming language - secdb/slang, get the hell out as soon as you can. you will be behind in mainstream technology, and you won't be marketable outside the company very soon. Once recruiter said there are some companies out there who simply won't interview any ex-goldman employees as they are just behind in technological skills, and there is a 'bad' reputation for ex-gs people you do NOT make tons of money here unless you are the exceptional 1%. most people would LOVE to make the avg gs salary - 350K or 400K as advertised in wall st, but it's extremely top heavy. Go to other hedgefunds who could easily pay much more. GS is very savvy when it comes to saving/making money, and they won't spend more money to keep you happy- but just enough so you don't leave. The culture is all about facade--- it's very superficial and no one trusts anyone. because of this 360 degree 'review' system they have, everyone pretends to be nice to everyone but when it comes to review, they can always backstab you because only a few people can get the high marks. When I left, there was a backlog of exit interviews up to 3 months - and another colleague of mine who left 1 month after me said he had to wait 6 months for his exit interview. In other words, there is a mass exodus happening in technology. If you are in technology, you are considered a 'cost center' and will NOT be treated the same way biz side folks are treated (traders, sales, strats). What I see in GS is all these cost center people, Tech, Ops, Infra, end up trying to suck up to the business folks, empowering them to act rudely as they have the ultimate say in everything. Expect an extremely political environment. Either you get into the fraternity or you are out. Since 2008, there hasn't really been a 'golden year' where everyone was happy with their compensation. GS would use 3 factors to determine your comp - your performance, company performance, market benchmark ---- and they would also find that one factor to tell you why your comp is not gonna be stellar this year. If you are a technologist fresh out of college, I would totally recommend you to go into startup space and that way you would learn so much more. If you are a lateral hire from a tech industry, don't come to GS. If you are lateral hire from another finance industry, GS may be better than other big banks.. but if your objective is to maximize your salary, I would recommend a hedgefund space instead.

4.0
Dec 9, 2015

Associate

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Having Goldman Sachs on your resume is a great asset. Most people think highly about this company because it has been apart of many high profile m&a and ipo deals and is known for its extensive recruiting practices and hardworking culture. So having this brand on your resume will convey many positive qualities to recruiters. If you get an offer here, definitely take it. Once hire, if you do not enjoy working here, stick it out for a few years and then start your search again.

Cons

Goldman Sachs experiences very high turnover and many people, on average, stay with the company for 2-4 years. For example, in my department, in one year, about 5 employees left for other companies. Our department only had 30 people so it was a huge brain drain for us. When I asked my former colleagues on why they left, many of them cited the long hours. Some would work over 80 hours a week and other for over 11 hour days. They said they were unable to see their kids grow up or had healthy issues related to the long work weeks. So know that these long hours aren't for every lifestyle. I believe their workweek is best suited for recent college grads and other individuals who have not yet started a family.

3.0
Mar 31, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Practical financial work that one can apply to their own life (taxes, retirement planning, cash flow planning, etc.) - A decent first job out of undergrad (assuming you graduated from a non-target undergrad where Goldman, McKinsey, hedge funds, Google, etc. do NOT recruit). - Ayco is a wholly owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs, so you get the name on your resume with some benefits (employee discounts, etc.). Ayco employees can be found in the Goldman Sachs internal employee directory, and a lot of you're employment paperwork is on GS letterhead, so I guess they're technically GS employees. - Can be a great experience, but it all depends on who's team you're placed on. If you work under a VP who's understanding and compassionate about the well-being of others, then you'll have an okay time and might even enjoy yourself. I'd say I had a good time. - Ultimately, wealth management is a sales job (depends on person if a pro or con). If you make it to VP, be prepared to be a salesman. However, you're pretty much handed rich clients, rather than cold-calling, so that's one thing really good about Ayco. The hard part is making it to VP. If the business is there, then you'll be rolling in the dough as a VP (but probably traveling and working a lot as well).

Cons

- If placed on a team with a "grinding" VP, be prepared to hate your life. You'll literally get called on holidays and asked to come into the office. An analyst in my office was called into work on Mother's Day while he was out with his family, and he was an hour and a half away from the office. Also, if you plan on moving up to the VP level, you're expected to come in before your superiors and leave after your superiors (which is understandable, especially in a "face-time" focused industry like finance). You're also expected to say "yes" to anything asked of you, including the anecdote mentioned above. Office politics is heavy; there's a lot of brown-nosing and kissing up. However, office politics is probably true of any work environment, especially finance; so everyone on Glassdoor complaining about how the politics suck at Ayco should stop complaining and grow up. Social politics is a part of life. - For a wealth management firm, Ayco places an unreasonable amount of time into the tax planning and tax return preparation of clients. If you're in the Financial Counseling division, I'd say that 75% of the work you do is tax related. The job is not as investment heavy as it is played out to be. As an analyst right out of undergrad (no CPA or any prior tax experience), you'll be preparing ultra complex tax returns for clients that involve multi-state sourcing of stock options and restricted stock grants, foreign income and foreign tax credits, etc. In addition, a good number of associates in the "tax department" do not even have a CPA, nor do the VPs. Pretty much, you'll be doing CPA level work for cheap. I don't understand why Ayco places so much emphasis on taxes; I don't believe it adds much value to the bottom line of the firm. If the wealth management divisions of Bulge Bracket Banks (Goldman Sachs [the REAL one], UBS, Morgan Stanley) are thriving with major AUM, have healthy profit margins, and aren't focusing on preparing tax returns, I do not buy the argument that Ayco makes that doing taxes "keeps us closer to our clients." Instead of spending so much time and emphasis on taxes, Ayco can spend more time on bringing in new business and AUM. I'm open to other arguments. - The pay is extremely low for the amount of work you're expected to do. You'll pretty much work Wall Street hours for 1/5th of the Wall Street analyst pay, and you won't have the exit opportunities that they have. - Morale is extremely low. Every analyst who isn't trying to make VP (I'd say about 80% aren't trying to make VP) is pretty much fed up after 1 year and start looking for a new job. However, it's frustrating because wealth management skills don't really transfer to any other industry besides wealth management. I'd say the low morale is a result of the low pay, corporate culture, and lack of employee perks compared to other companies (I hear of a lot of places that serve free lunch everyday and give every other Friday off). - SORRY FOR ANY GRAMMATICAL/SPELLING ERRORS. I KNOW ANYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH WHAT I HAVE SAID WILL PROBABLY TRY TO USE MY GRAMMAR AS AN AD HOMINEM. NOT HERE TO WRITE AN ACADEMIC ESSAY, JUST GET MY POINTS ACROSS.

Viewing 16 - 18 of 19,416 Reviews

Glassdoor has 23,910 Goldman Sachs reviews submitted anonymously by Goldman Sachs employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Goldman Sachs is right for you.