Gulfstream reviews

3.7

65% would recommend to a friend

(1,544 total reviews)

Mark Burns

71% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

Gulfstream has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 1,544 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Gulfstream employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
3.0
Jul 3, 2015

Not so diverse

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Plenty of jobs! If you have a specific area of expertise.

Cons

Good luck getting a job!

2.0
Jul 1, 2015

Senior Engineer

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

High pay. The people are friendly.

Cons

Management manages by humiliation, fear, and intimidation. Do not present bad news such as tests failing.

2.0
Jun 29, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They offer at or above industry standard compensation in my experience, in a location with a very modest cost of living. 4/40 schedule, but be prepared to work more. Savannah has its own charm but people coming from aerospace companies in progressive areas like Southern California or Washington may find it a bit backward. The work can be quite interesting, especially on new projects. Lots of good opportunities for young engineers, but advancement comes to a grinding halt as you get to mid and upper experience levels.

Cons

Hands down, the most frustrating management structure I have ever dealt with out of the five aerospace location I have worked. Low level decisions go all the way to the top, where they are discussed in the perpetual meetings between the department heads, directors, and VPs. Directors continually spin status to an insane degree to make themselves look better in front of the VPs. This is how the Directors got to be Directors, though, because all the VPs want is people to tell them what they want to hear and agree with their decisions. The result is that tasking for the engineers actually doing the work frequently makes no sense, since the decision making process is so disconnected from reality. Engineering constantly operates in "fire drill mode". A good lead engineer or department head can sometimes compensate by serving a buffer between the engineers and the upper level managers, but the ones who are willing to do that tend to burn out or get fired (I saw both), so they don't last very long.

Viewing 1408 - 1410 of 1,544 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,909 Gulfstream reviews submitted anonymously by Gulfstream employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Gulfstream is right for you.