Innodata reviews

- Horrible communication. All company announcements result in widespread confusion. Everyone in management and HR seems to have a different interpretation of company policies and client requirements. Ask two different people and you'll get two different answers. Subsequent attempts by upper management to clarify things are equally confusing and full of conflicting information. - The company kowtows to the unreasonable demands, broken systems, and conflicting guidelines of its big ticket clients. Employees are expected to make up for issues caused by the clients' poor communication and lack of quality control. - No clear path to advancement - No opportunities to upskill within the company - Oppressive client time tracking system - Misleading and incorrect information given to prospective hires - Poor organization of internal documentation, information scattered around multiple folders and files

- Very few (if any) opportunities for growth, development, or advancement - You won't gain any transferable skills aside from being able to tell prospective employers that you "worked in AI" - Some projects are interesting, while others are extremely boring and mind numbing - I was hired through Robert Half as a "writing specialist" and was told the position was writing intensive; however, several projects involved looking at images/videos and clicking checkboxes - I always got the sense that the job wasn't secure, whether it was not having any work for 3+ months, hearing about layoffs, or working on projects that would have made way more financial sense to be assigned to outsourced employees. I also recently saw Innodata advertising for part-time, independant contractor generative AI associates, which leads me to believe they may want to cut full-time employees in this position who receive benefits. - Despite achieving high performance metrics, I only received a modest bonus and didn't receive a salary adjustment after receiving positive feedback in an annual performance review