employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integral Ad Science

Engaged Employer

Integral Ad Science reviews

3.5

55% would recommend to a friend

(360 total reviews)
avatar

Lisa Utzschneider

72% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Integral Ad Science has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 360 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Integral Ad Science employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

360 reviews
1.0
Jan 12, 2018

No Value

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Super laid back coworkers. -unlimited vacation pto -free lunch every friday -free snacks & drinks

Cons

This company doesn't value their employees, they will cut you like it's nothing. I've seen 5 people get let go with a snap of a finger. Like every other review states about management, incompetent and arrogant. They've cut back on a lot of spending and is not using the resources for their employees. which means very limited spending on everyone and every office. There is not much support to help you grow as they advertise in the interviews to be. They practice and preach "transparency" but that doesn't exist at all. Sales team is unorganized and every quarter there are new policies and procedures that take place. If you question why a sales process is changing they basically ignore you or don't give you a definite answer because they themselves don't know whats going on.

1.0
Jul 21, 2017

Managerial incompetence and Screwed-up potential

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice office and occasionally laid-back environment.

Cons

Where should one start: lack of overall company direction, incompetent and weak upper management, even more incompetent and arrogant middle management, suffocating bright and hard-working lower-level employees. If you want to just clock the hours or deal with constant fire drills, and have a sense of zero achievement and acknowledgement, this is your place. This company truly exists in a two-floor world of complete disconnect between decision-makers and executors. It praises people of talk and smothers folks with abilities to make things happen. Their engines are running out of power.

1.0
Apr 15, 2020

Not Meeting Expectations/Needs Improvement

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Technology is in-demand in the market and has a good business model. I came across plenty of smart, capable folks who genuinely wanted to help their coworkers and clients be successful. Coworkers are typically super friendly and I've made great connections along the way. Free lunches once a week, some snacks in the offices. Free beer/wine on tap. Definite work/life balance compared to other companies.

Cons

No opportunity for equity, so employees have no skin in the game, no loyalty to the company. This creates tension because we know who will get paid out when IAS gets sold again, and it won't be the employees who were forced to sell their equity to Vista. Toxic alcohol culture reinforced by the company since offices always have beer/wine on tap -- this is seen as a benefit by some. One may observe how normalized drinking is at IAS, in a very old-school kind of way where certain employees seem to consistently drink . IAS supports alcohol consumption more-so than employees being fit and active; I don't need you to buy me booze, AND it'd be great if you reallocated resources to facilitate employee health and wellness. Company isn't compensating employees based on their market value or performance, even if roles and responsibilities change. Bonus scoring arbitrary. For example, recent changes were made from the top down where bonuses were suddenly "recalibrated" including an arbitrary Vista score (A, B, C, D etc) resulting in lower bonuses across the board than ever before. This was POORLY communicated to employees. My manager discouraged me from fighting for a well-deserved raise. Too many managers, first time managers (this is a BIG ONE) and middlemen to leadership, so if you're a lower level employee or individual contributor even if you communicate a gap, things are unlikely to change. The rate of change is painfully slow. Constant change in leadership, folks coming and going. As an employee/IC, it may feel like you are expected to continually prove yourself to someone new who may not even be around to see through to or be invested in your successes. IAS is a pretty large company, and unfortunately even with the best intentions the CEO can only affect so much change in so much time. Current leadership for certain teams is still figuring out how to forge career paths within the company, so unless your goal is to become a manager there are no opportunities for advancement and won't be for some time, opportunity cost for employees leading to attrition. Poor and toxic leadership in some cases not only goes unnoticed, but may even get promoted (360 reviews anyone??). For example, I have been personally chastised by certain leadership in a very unprofessional way and was assured their boss would address (with seemingly no change or positive result). And hearing from multiple employees that HR complaints have already been submitted with no results further discouraged me from addressing.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 360 Reviews

Glassdoor has 401 Integral Ad Science reviews submitted anonymously by Integral Ad Science employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Integral Ad Science is right for you.