employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes

Engaged Employer

Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes reviews

3.0

36% would recommend to a friend

(873 total reviews)

Nanci Bell

26% approve of CEO

19% positive business outlook

Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 873 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

873 reviews
2.0
Aug 1, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I can't think of any. If you need a job, and can live on $13/hour, then I guess that's a pro.

Cons

A quote from the director of my center: "we teach reading, not character." This comment was in response to complaints from clinicians about a six-year-old girl who repeatedly hit, kicked, bit, spit on, and swore at those who tried to teach her. She did not receive any sort of consequence, as that was not part of the job. In general, the job of clinician at LBLP is limited to prescriptive, rote work forced on students for hours at a time. This is much more of a skill and drill environment than an environment encouraging critical thinking and when students get upset or act out, clinicians must endure ridiculous treatment in addition to laughably low pay. The work for both students and clinicians is tedious and repetitive. Clinicians are typically kept on summer hours or just below full-time hours in order to avoid providing benefits. Few opportunities to move up. If interested in any type of real teaching, not the place to go.

4.0
Jul 16, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked at lblp during summers while I was in college. It's extremely rewarding to work with children and see them make improvements that will be with them for the rest of their lives.

Cons

Long training period- you may be able to wiggle out of retraining if your center head knows you are good. It can be stressful working with some of the kids, but other employees are very supportive and share ideas for strategies to use. I received pay raises only as standard protocol- it didn't seem like there were merit raises, and there was no opportunity for growth unless you worked there full time for years.

2.0
Jul 9, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The methods and materials really do help dyslexic readers make quick and impressive progress in decoding. It's rewarding to see students make such quick progress as decoders, and the students and other reading clinicians are usually a pleasure to work with. Clinicians learn a LOT about reading education in a short time.

Cons

Diagnosticians and managers play favorites by giving as many hours as possible to clinicians they like personally and to those who buy 100% into the company's arguably reductionist teaching philosophy. Even if you have a graduate degree in reading educate from a prestigious university, managers will cut your hours by half or more if they like others clinicians better than they like you. There's no way for the majority of the part-time, contingent reading clinicians the company exploits to make ends meet and almost no hope of advancement (very, very, very competitive promotion process). Clinicians get paid over $10 per hour less than most tutors, even though the intensive and specialized training and the tutoring itself are majorly challenging and high pressure. Some students rebel against the often overbearing demands of the intensive instruction to which they are subjected for many hours per day, but clinicians are expected to stay bubbly and upbeat and interesting every minute of the day to "motivate" students. Managers scapegoat clinicians for systemic problems with the program. The overly narrow approach to reading instruction can create "super remedial readers" (students who can automatically decode almost any real or unreal word thrown at them but who continue to have trouble making meaning from the texts they read). The severe restrictions placed on the language and methods that clinicians can use to teach are mainly to blame.

Viewing 799 - 801 of 873 Reviews

Glassdoor has 952 Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes reviews submitted anonymously by Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes is right for you.