Pros
Solid PTO, comprehensive benefits, competitive compensation
Cons
I joined excited about the opportunity at what appeared to be a strong Blackstone-backed company, but reality didn't match what was described during hiring. The scope of my role and culture ended up being quite different from what was originally presented. - There is a strong emphasis on optics. Appearing busy or important can matter more than the impact of the work. At times it seems like some were hired quickly based on "looking the part", not demonstrable experience or skills. Some seem more focused on the optics of their expertise than on actually developing it. - Many talented people carry the workload of multiple roles without advancement, while promotions often feel influenced by personal relationships instead of performance. Turnover and restructuring seem common. - Many don't feel comfortable raising concerns with their managers or HR, because it doesn't always feel like they're handled confidentially, conscientiously, or without consequences. HR comes off as reactive and defensive rather than supportive. - Rules and policies appear to vary based on team or seniority. Expectations around remote work also seem to be inconsistent. When gray areas or loopholes exist, they create inconsistency, confusion, and the perception of unfair treatment. - Despite the Blackstone backing, repeated layoffs and comp freezes have created genuine uncertainty about the company's long-term financial stability. Cost discipline feels uneven, as the company continues to reduce middle management while maintaining a disproportionately large leadership layer. Overall, the company seems to struggle with transparency, consistency, and accountability amid financial uncertainty, which has impacted morale.