McMaster-Carr reviews

2.8

29% would recommend to a friend

(1,362 total reviews)

Jay Delaney

30% approve of CEO

45% positive business outlook

McMaster-Carr has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 1,362 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The McMaster-Carr employee rating is 24% below average for employers within the Construction, Repair & Maintenance Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Aug 21, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very little but I will say that benefits were amazing and at least the cafeteria food was usually pretty darn good

Cons

Pretty much everything else. From the authoritarian "big brother is always watching" feeling that everyone walks around with to the incredibly inconsistent management feedback to the soul crushing monotony of the actual work. It has the potential of being a great place to work if all that was changed. Hell even if just optimism existed it would be manageable. There is a reason people don't last there and it's good if u don't. It means u have creative thinking and dignity. I was reviewed 9 times during a 12 month period and met or exceeded expectation 7 of those times. I was told that I was inconsistent the previous year (and couldn't even point to any metrics or data to support this...they just went with "feel") and then was let go a month later. I had already been preparing for it since it seemed that if you get a bad annual review there is essentially nothing you can do to dissuade the course. Honestly I can't say this enough, if you have an education and thrive on engaging, fulfilling, collaborative work experiences...do yourself a favor and don't bother here!

2.0
Apr 2, 2016

Great Benefits, but at a High Price

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The benefits and high salary will lure you in - it's the only reason I am rating McMaster-Carr with 2 stars instead of 1. Fully covered medical, dental, tuition reimbursement, profit sharing bonus, pension plan, "work-life" balance. You'll think initially you hit the jackpot when you receive an offer from McMaster-Carr.

Cons

The culture at McMaster-Carr is extremely strange, to say the least. Previous reviews here on Glassdoor which describe the working environment as "soul-sucking" are completely true. At first, you are not sure what to think of their business model; they only hire management externally, set ridiculously high standards on their employees, and control basically all aspects of your movements, including your breaks. It also doesn't take very long to realize that it is a terrible practice to keep hiring 22 year-old new graduates with absolutely no credentials except an Ivy League degree to run your departments - These little ones have no idea what is going on when they arrive, but can get smug just because they are given a higher title. It doesn't matter how long you work at McMaster-Carr - If you aren't hired into a management track, you'll get to spend the rest of your career (if you can even call it a career at McMaster-Carr) looking forward to a rotating crop of incompetent managers & supervisors dictating your every move throughout the day, including monitoring your breaks down to the minute (and that's what they think contributes to a great "work-life" balance). McMaster-Carr is stubbornly against evolving away from these management hiring practices - The company makes it obvious that they could care less about their employees and its reputation. They deserve the high turnover rate that exists throughout the company.

2.0
Feb 6, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The health benefits were the best I have ever had. There was profit sharing in December so we would receive a nice chunk of extra cash if the company made a profit. If the company profited 300% that year, then you received your monthly salary multiplied by 3. This makes it nice to be able to save. The cafeteria food was pretty good and it was inexpensive. I really liked the people I worked with, but there was little time to get to talk to them. The hours were normal and I was never pressured to work overtime. I worked from 9:15am - 6:00pm my entire time there.

Cons

The two stars I gave this company were for the benefits, regular hours, and the fact that I actually did enjoy the specific work I was doing. I walked into work every day with a smile on my face, and ready to do the best I could. But the reality was I was never sure if that day was my last. This company hires and fires people all the time. When I was offered the job, I was told I would be working a 9:15-6:00 shift for the first six months, and after that they generally like to let the employees pick their own hours. So I waited for management to bring this up after 6 months, but they never did. Not once did they ask if I wanted to change my hours. After talking to a couple co-workers later on, they said, Yeah, that's just something HR tells people. Training is lacking. When I first started I had an 11 day training program and then threw me into the fire. I was transferred to a different department after working at the company for three months. I got little one on one training and then was thrown into the fire again. They spend time training when the work is slower, so we see fewer examples of difficult work. Management and my trainers / fellow employees were never on the same page. My managers would give me pieces of work that I hadn't even been trained on yet. You are expected to work fast and with no mistakes. Sometimes you were emailed when you made a mistake and other times you would find out that you made one when you had your review. When I started with my department, we didn't have reviews each month, just whenever they felt like pulling us in to a meeting. There you would find out how much work you finished and how long on average it took you to do each piece. Sometimes my managers would say I made a mistake, but when I went back and looked at the piece of work they were referring to, I hadn't made any mistake. This happened so many times that I started to document these examples. It made me think that I was going crazy, or that they just didn't like me and wanted me to leave, or that I was a part of some social experiment. I will never know why they took the time to write down 'examples' of my mistakes that were simply false. Sometimes one manager didn't even know why something was counted as an error on my review, and they had to ask the other manager. Once I set up a customer's account a certain way based on an email that a manager sent to me, and then I was told I did it incorrectly. They claimed something changed. Since we had about 3 department meetings a year, we were never on the same page. It was so confusing and made me have no trust in management! They changed their minds whenever it suited them. There were also several times where management didn't know how to do a procedure in our work, but they would tell me I did it wrong. If I wasn't trained on how to do it correctly, and they don't know how to do it, how was I supposed to know how to do it? They never seemed to see this was an issue. You are held to the same time and quality standards as a co-worker who has been there 20 plus years. I became so scared that my time for completing work was too high and they were going to let me go. Sometimes I would hear my manager leave for the day and I thought, 'I can't get fired right now, I made it another day'. Sometimes I had an itch on my nose while I was typing and I thought to myself, just finish your work and scratch your nose after, so I could keep those extra two seconds off my time. Ridiculous, right? But this is absolutely what I did and thought. We started having a rubric for the last six months when I was at the company that was designed to recognize the good work that we did. Five pieces of random work were chosen and we would look at these with management in our reviews. This was great for the first few months, because it really was random. However, the last few months, the five 'random' pieces of work were suddenly all from the 10% of the more difficult, decision making pieces of work that we did. That allowed management to nit-pick the work and say that they would have done something different. One time I received a 0.00% error rate for the month, but my manager tore apart the five random pieces of work. I didn't do anything incorrectly on those pieces of work, but since my manager said she would have dome some things different, my score went down, and I left the meeting feeling defeated. That is when I realized that it doesn't really matter how hard I work or how hard I try to do better and please management. If they want to say I made mistakes, they were going to find ways to do it. They finally let me go due to my performance.

Viewing 139 - 141 of 1,362 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,400 McMaster-Carr reviews submitted anonymously by McMaster-Carr employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if McMaster-Carr is right for you.