Northrop Grumman reviews

3.8

76% would recommend to a friend

(13,373 total reviews)
avatar

Kathy Warden

81% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Northrop Grumman has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 13,373 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Northrop Grumman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

13K reviews
3.0
Mar 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

9/80 Flexible Schedule WFH based on Leader

Cons

It’s a large company so promos are slow to happen on HR Side Good Husband/Wife environment

5.0
Mar 4, 2026

Excellent Place to work

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Higher salary bands and bonus potential compared to individual contributor roles • Greater influence on hiring, staffing, and team development • Strong leadership experience that opens doors to program or director-level roles • Ability to shape team culture and mentor younger engineers

Cons

Much less hands-on technical work • Heavy meeting load and administrative responsibilities (performance reviews, budgeting, HR issues) • Middle management can feel pressure from both leadership and employees • Advancement beyond section/department manager can be slow and somewhat political

4.0
Mar 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Amazing WLB - no micromanaging 2. Fireproof - I’ve never even heard of anyone getting fired here and Id expect this is especially true if you have program clearance (SAP) 3. Pay is livable - nothing spectacular but you can live off of it 4. Learning opportunities - You may be able to learn a little from some projects 5. Critical, National Security projects 6. Predictable, reliable leveling comes with YOE

Cons

Lower pay - the pay is much less than the tech industry, otherwise similar to others within industry Boring - I find myself atrophying with my technical aptitude when assigned tasks on projects that are decades old Tenure-based - level is largely based on YOE instead of contribution or ability RTO - I personally have been given projects that are remote and given projects that exist within a SCIF (no phones, no external internet on classified system) and projects within a SCIF can only be worked on-site Red Tape - updating classified software with unclassified software is not going to happen with existing projects, and even for newer projects, it takes a few months to even get it inside to start testing with real data and is usually not realistic for a newer-project timeline Coworker variance - some coworkers enjoy the work, are good at it, and know what they’re doing. Others do not nor do they care.

Viewing 304 - 306 of 13,373 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,144 Northrop Grumman reviews submitted anonymously by Northrop Grumman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Northrop Grumman is right for you.