Mar 18, 2026
Northrop Grumman reviews
3.8
76% would recommend to a friend
Kathy Warden
81% approve of CEO
65% positive business outlook
Race / Ethnicity
Gender
Sexual orientation
Disability
Parent or family caregiver
Veteran status
Northrop Grumman has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 13,371 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Northrop Grumman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).
Reviews by job title
13K reviews
1.0
Mar 17, 2026
Don't work here if you are neuro divergent
Former employee, more than 1 year
Melbourne, FL
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
1. High-Fidelity Engineering You aren't just building CRUD apps or marketing sites. You are working on multi-threaded, event-driven systems where the cost of failure is measured in hardware or lives, not just lost ad revenue. The Pro: It forces you to develop a level of technical discipline that "move fast and break things" startups rarely require. You learn how to handle race conditions, memory management, and real-time constraints at a Tier-1 level. 2. "Audit-Grade" Standards The software at these firms is subject to rigorous technical audits and government oversight. The Pro: Having your code pass these audits is a massive "Receipt of Quality." It proves to any future employer that your work is effective, efficient, and compliant with the highest security and stability standards in the world. It’s an objective stamp of approval that survives long after you leave the company. 3. The "Force Multiplier" Resume L3Harris is a global brand. Having it on your resume for several years acts as a "Gatekeeper's Pass." The Pro: It signals to recruiters that you can handle high-level security clearances, massive codebases, and complex documentation. It makes you a "safe" hire for any other aerospace, defense, or high-security tech firm (like Palantir or SpaceX). 4. Stability and "Big Ship" Infrastructure For someone who thrives in structured environments, these companies offer immense resources. The Pro: You have access to specialized hardware, expensive testing labs, and a massive network of subject-matter experts. Unlike a startup where you wear ten hats, here you get to go deep into specific domains like signal processing, simulation, or systems architecture.
Cons
1. Subjective Evaluation vs. Objective Data The Problem: Management prioritizes "perceived" speed or "social visibility" over actual system reliability. The Con: This creates a "Performance Theater" where the person who looks busiest or follows the most traditional social cues is rewarded, while the engineer who does deep-trace logic analysis to prevent system failures is labeled "slow." 2. Failure of ADA Compliance & Accommodations The Problem: Ignoring a medical diagnosis (ADHD) and maintaining a PIP based on symptoms of that diagnosis is a fundamental failure of the Interactive Process required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Con: The company culture lacks the maturity to integrate diverse cognitive styles, choosing "conformity" over the high-level problem-solving skills that neurodivergent engineers often bring to complex systems. 3. "Legacy" Management Debt The Problem: Using outdated "intuition-based" management styles (common in older defense contractors) rather than modern engineering metrics like DORA. The Con: In these environments, you are essentially at the mercy of your manager's personal opinion. If they don't understand your workflow, they categorize it as a failure, regardless of the technical quality of the output. 4. The "PIP" Trap The Problem: Using a PIP as a "death row" for employment rather than a roadmap. The Con: Once the "administrative machinery" for firing someone starts, it rarely stops, even if a team lead provides positive feedback. This shows a disconnect between the people doing the work and the HR/Upper Management level.
1.0
Mar 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
Big company, big name, good resume bullet. Mission was relevant and high visibility, not so much any more.
Cons
Leadership massively changed about a year ago for the worse. From what I could tell (they don't tell line managers anything here) the company bosses up North let their greed get the better of them. Now, all of the programs here in Tampa are burning down slowly but surely. Management from up North fly down regularly because they can't figure out how to lead this place. You can tell they don't care at all about the employees in Tampa. It is the cyber Titanic.
Viewing 277 - 279 of 13,371 Reviews