Osaic reviews

2.5

28% would recommend to a friend

(457 total reviews)
avatar

Jamie Price

30% approve of CEO

23% positive business outlook

Osaic has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 457 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Osaic employee rating is 31% below average for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

457 reviews
3.0
Apr 28, 2021

Real Talk

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This company has great potential. There are scores of talented and dedicated employees across the country who are truly committed to the success of the financial professionals who have chosen to do business with AG wealth management firms. Because the organization runs so lean, working here was a tremendous opportunity to remain challenged, be productive, learn, innovate, and grow professionally.

Cons

AG was ill prepared to take on the acquisition of Ladenburg. Understandably, the pandemic was a complicating factor. But over a year after the merger/acquisition, many employees were working from home, often with equipment they purchased themselves or already owned, without reimbursement or even a uniform policy to address the investments an employee needed to make to do their job. While working from home was a welcome opportunity (they previously did not trust employees to do that unless you’d been in a remote contract agreement, or your manager would make an exception from time to time), in 2020 and through 2021, call volumes and workloads were higher than ever. During that same period, post merger, there was uncertainty about future compensation structure, compensation “leveling” was supposed to occur (and was either never done or never communicated about), and the added stress of seeing quite a few people “downsized”, while seeing other departments remain understaffed and drowning. Yet, during that same period, the organization spent quite a bit of money on new executive-level hires. For all of the “streamlining” in other areas, the top heavy structure created a clunky communication and decision-making structure, an inability to be nimble, and quite a bit of disconnect between the executive-level corporate talking points, the frontline experience of their employees, and the feedback those employees were getting from financial professionals. That’s a recipe for a drain on morale. Compensation is fairly low for the industry, with disproportionately high expectations and sophistication expected relative to what they’re willing to pay employees. This is short-sighted from a corporate standpoint because turnover is expensive and a drag on productivity.

avatar
Osaic Response
5y
Thank you for your thoughtful observations and suggestions. Integrations of companies present challenges, and we continue to address these issues to become a stronger and profitable combined entity.
Viewing 295 - 297 of 457 Reviews

Glassdoor has 497 Osaic reviews submitted anonymously by Osaic employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Osaic is right for you.