Outreach reviews

3.8

73% would recommend to a friend

(561 total reviews)
avatar

Abhijit Mitra

92% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Outreach has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 561 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Outreach employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

561 reviews
1.0
Apr 30, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Best part of Outreach was leaving. The product is good, but the management is not. Outreach was a hard but satisfying place to work in 2018, but now all the good folks have left or are keeping their heads down trying to ride it out to IPO. There are really hard working good people in the trenches here, propping this place up - like any company, if you're lucky enough to be on a team with a good manager and teammates, it can be alright. Originally this place had A LOT of good people but leadership has driven the vast majority away (so the "former-Outreacher" support groups are pretty good).

Cons

The company runs on burning out its people. People were underwater beforehand and then they laid people off - many of whom had critical tribal knowledge - and expect the rest to pick up the work while also making the working environment worse (RTO, etc). Used at least appear to support modern values like diversity, paternity leave, WFH, equity, but all are on a downward trajectory now. Almost no growth opportunity, and it is systemic, especially in CS: in nearly half a decade at this company, I think I saw maybe 10 out of hundreds of people get promoted to manager, less than 5 people get promoted higher than that. There is absolutely no change accepted from the bottom up - only leadership needs matter, and only as long as the most recent emergency lasts, or who is the loudest bully. Training, enablement, is not provided, it is entirely dependent on the quality of your peers, leaders spend all their time talking with each other in meetings. They had a diversity event for Black History Month where the CEO showed up for 4 minutes to accept credit for promoting diversity, then laid them off the next week. Layoffs were carried out in 10 minute group meetings at 7am. Some people who were not laid off expressed that they wish they had been. Sales, CS, and Ops have awful work-life balance and leaders who are either bullies (Sales) or feckless (CS and Ops). Poor planning (or non-existent planning) leads contributors to work late, work early, and work weekends. Leaders have an idea, want it executed the next week with no project resources, change their mind the next week, and then reverse course again. The office culture in Seattle sucks and just serves the needs of leaders to feel important. Leadership wants the old culture back but doesn't realize it was the people they have driven away that made it what it was. Sr. leadership is extremely insular, cliquey, and doesn't listen to each other or their staff. Silos are MASSIVE. I'll never forget the few attempts at company happy hours (which all were super spreader events) advertised as chances to bond together and then leaders just sat with and talked to each other and their friends.

2.0
Oct 10, 2022

What the heck happened to this wonderful place?

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Sales engagement/execution is the future Lots of energy put towards DEI !

Cons

The CEO is a bully. He’s fired nearly all the sales leadership, said his go to market strategy is very strong (it’s not), said our sales woes are to be blamed on all the AEs being lazy (we’re not), and said the product is amazing (he fired the chief of product a month ago). PIPs are going out en mass. It’s all really sad. This place was amazing. The culture was amazing. Now it all seems like it was a farce.

2.0
Aug 13, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

fully-paid health insurance friendly people smart engineers

Cons

You get the feeling that product managers, program managers, directors, and VPs are just hanging on for IPO, and they create work for others to make themselves seem valuable. I don't know how else to explain the strange lack of communication, and lack of efficiency. It's a problem because a lot of the actual technical problems go unsolved. It's frustrating when you know what needs to be done but you're stuck in a twilight zone world of google docs, spreadsheets, and meetings. There are meetings and meetings then all that gets created is a document. Then that document creates more meetings. Then no one reads the document ever again, no engineers start work, and everyone's moved on to some other initiative. Often, It took a good bit of effort to not ask others "what exactly do you *do* though?". I will say that when I spoke with the engineers, it was a breath of fresh air. They spoke in real terms about real problems and real solutions. Our meetings were productive. However, my world was surrounded by a couple dozen product managers, program managers, directors, and VPs, and it really was a surreal experience most of the time, not knowing what jargon-filled world they seemed to be living in. The product at this stage does not need this much management around it. Also, more personally, I often experienced that a week would often go by without a response from my direct supervisor. They wouldn't show up for one on ones. When I did speak with them, they were great. But then my supervisor changed without anyone informing me. One week I just saw a new calendar event for a one on one with a new manager. This new manager was also a friendly person. But at one point, after working hard, late nights, and overtime for a week to get some projects completed and shared with everyone, on the very next day, they admitted that they "aren't really familiar with what work I've been doing," and acted like that's okay. I thought at the time that "actually that is exactly what you're supposed to be familiar with". I was pretty appalled. My new manager directed me to change roles and manage a different team with about a fifteen minute warning for both me and the new team. It was awkward, needless to say. I declined the new position, since it wasn't where I can provide the most value, and there were better internal candidates for the role. Soon after, I was let go with severance. Meanwhile, lots of money is spent celebrating the successes of getting closer to unicorn status or IPO, or on expensive real estate, or hiring probably twice the amount of employees that are actually needed at this stage of a product. Everyone there was honestly a pretty good person, it seemed. But I have a feeling this company, with its funding and push toward rewarding its investors, is a castle made of sand.

Viewing 31 - 33 of 561 Reviews

Glassdoor has 578 Outreach reviews submitted anonymously by Outreach employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Outreach is right for you.