employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

PNC Financial Services Group

Engaged Employer

PNC Financial Services Group reviews

3.2

49% would recommend to a friend

(9,879 total reviews)
avatar

William S. Demchak

50% approve of CEO

44% positive business outlook

PNC Financial Services Group has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 9,879 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The PNC Financial Services Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

10K reviews
2.0
Sep 17, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote, Virtual, work related capabilities

Cons

Equal Employment Opportunity , Ethics and and recognition through advancement for contributions are not a reality at this company. PNC will profess all the correct policies of inclusion, equal opportunity, etc. to the public and its employees. However, expect the reality of "soft-firing" techniques including favoritism, ageism, sexism and racism. Inclusion, that involves the opportunity to even be interviewed for positions, where an internal applicant meets the minimum qualifications, and the company openly allows and implements a practice of advances based on who the hiring managers know and "feel" comfortable with to include within their group , is not inclusion but the very essence of discrimination and violation of the 1964 acts passed in an attempt to protect U.S. citizens. PNC is the poster child for institutional discrimination. No actual checks or balances by the company, but all the politically correct personas. This is a company for an individual looking for a first job, to be used as a short-term employer, to obtain resume credit for another employer.

1.0
Jun 15, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get paid on time

Cons

AML Operations is the Perfect Example of a TOXIC Work Environment You haven't lived until you've received, in February 2019, an invitation from a senior manager for a process improvement meeting called "Make AML Great Again". And senior management ran the department just like the current occupant of the White House. Yes, you read that correctly, and of course this happened during Black History Month. Senior management is clueless, and are only interested in hearing from "yes men" who blindly agree with management's ideas. If you ask for clarification on something, you are marked as "difficult" and will be targeted accordingly, a process referred to by AML senior management and team leads as being "managed out of PNC". The team leads/managers that distribute the work do so in a bullying fashion at the direction of senior management, by assigning employees that are not viewed in a favorable light by management an abundance of cases with "expedited due dates", or an abundance of "high risk" cases involving more thorough reviews, or assigning in such a way that all cases for that week are due on Mondays, combined with revoking teleworking privileges while also limiting building access hours. After asking a valid question about case assignments during a "questions" portion of a meeting about case assignments, one of the bullying team leads took my manager aside and told them to "get me under control". Meanwhile, this female team lead was doing the work of a male direct report for him after hours. Also, there are a little over 20 Quality Analysts that review the work of the Investigators. Once senior management decided to target me, I had the same 3-4 Quality Analysts over the next 3 years, although they are supposedly randomly assigned. The Quality Analysts assigned to me combed through my work with a fine-toothed comb, looking for any reason to reject it. Senior management went outside of our clearly written procedures TWICE, just to reject my work. I documented the actual procedures in their respective cases to show the departure from the procedures. Each team was required to have daily morning meetings where we would discuss our work and its progress. It became glaringly obvious to my team that my work was held to a much higher standard than the rest of my team. I have witnessed an employee actually stay in the building overnight due to trying to meet deadlines due to intentional case overloads while dealing with building access that is cut off earlier for them than the rest of the employees. That employee was fired upon returning to work the following morning after going home to take a shower. The fact that INTEGRITY is one of PNC's core values is laughable in AML Operations. Employee Relations/Human Resources is just an extension of AML Operation's discriminatory actions, and only serve to identify employees for retaliation including being interrogated and falsely accused by a VP from HR interrogate about a disability for which PNC already had the required documentation. HR operates however they want to with absolutely no regard for the law, demanding that employees use personal phones for communication with them so that the conversation does not occur on a recorded line. If everything that PNC's HR department does is supposed to be above board, why the secrecy and demands that a non-official means of communication be used? *There is supporting documentation available for every statement made in this review*

4.0
Feb 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Branches are not as rigid as some of the larger competition. Managers still have room to run things according to their customer traffic. The corporate structure allows for good upward mobility. People are treated fairly well and there is an easy system for reporting hr issues anonymously. Incentive possibility ranges from decent for licensed employees or bankers. Licensed bankers have the ability to obtain full licensing without a minimum commitment to stay with the company. Good hours with branches in my area open from 9am-5pm in lobby and depending on the branch limited to no saturday employment. Bank is closed on all federal holidays unlike some competitor's. Company provides good training which may include expense paid travel to out of state classes. For the most part the atmosphere is positive with more focus on customer service than sales although this is beginning to change.

Cons

Pay is on the low end of the industry for tellers and bankers which results in high turn over. As of recent there has been a change in top level management with people from other big banks who are trying to implement the hard sales tactics of other firms at PNC causing the culture to shift to be more like industry heavyweights. The teller role is being weeded out to additinal atms and the "universal model" aka tellerless branches so full time teller spots are limited causing a loss of young talent. Not enough time spent fostering new entry level employees. Strict customer service scoring which makes it difficult for any busy branch to maintain passing scores. The branch auditors are ridiculous and care more about failing offices than giving them the updates on policies so they can pass. The company does not pay incentive until half way throught the next quarter making it difficult to leave bc if you are not employed on the day that incentive is paid you will not get it even if you were employed through the end of the quarter. They discourage over and under achievers by reprimanding low sales and putting a cap on high incentives. If you land a huge sale they reserve the right to ingnore the percentage you are due per the comp plan and pay you a reduced amount to avoid "windfall incentives". Goals are established monthly but they pay you quarterly which makes no sense.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 9,879 Reviews

Glassdoor has 10,541 PNC Financial Services Group reviews submitted anonymously by PNC Financial Services Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PNC Financial Services Group is right for you.