Peraton Software Developer reviews

3.7

56% would recommend to a friend

(91 total reviews)
avatar

Steve Schorer

44% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Software Developer employees have rated Peraton with 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 91 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Software Developer professionals have a good working experience there. Peraton is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Software Developer professionals compared to other employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

91 reviews
1.0
Apr 14, 2026

Cheap and toxic

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Had some coworkers I liked at least and I'll miss

Cons

If you want to work for a company that offers minimal benefits, no stock options, no bonuses, an incredibly low base salary that's verging on predatory, laughable annual raises, and want to work under management that fights you tooth and nail on paying for the tools you need to do your job, then look no further than Peraton. Myself and several others I worked with hit all our metrics and were given good performance reviews with no negative feedback against us, yet management gave us a measely 1.5% annual raise and acted like we were lucky to get that. I have had to fight to get the company to reimburse me for a work trip to a client. Which by the way, you're given a budget so small ($100 per day), it's hard to stick to with the cost of ubers, breakfast, lunch, almost "mandatory" company dinners (which they won't pay for), and almost "mandatory" happy hour (which again they won't pay for). I also had to pay extra out of my own pocket for that trip because I didn't want to fly the red-eye they wanted me to take because of it being the cheapest option.

2.0
Apr 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job security is somewhat good, as it is for most government contracting companies. Some teams (not all) are afforded the luxury of flexibility in their working hours. Management for these teams cares more about your ability to deliver rather than clocking in and out on a certain time which is refreshing but does lead to the con listed below.

Cons

All the teams I've worked on are overworked, mainly due to two reasons: 1. Deadlines are frequently unrealistic as management has the motto, "Shoot for the stars, land on the moon." Sounds nice, but in practice, it leads to us becoming burnt out from constant crunch. 2. Peraton pays VERY FAR below market rates across the board. Annual raises will also not cover inflation. This in turn leads to Peraton usually only being able to hire the desperate and the, "less than talented." Even amongst government contractors like Northrup, Lockheed, etc, Peraton's pay is quite below market rates. This in turn leads to Peraton not being able to compete with competitors for the best hires which then in turn leads to a minority of employees having to carry the slack of their coworkers. In my anecdotal experience, it seems far more common at Peraton to find that "Atlas" employee having to do the work of 5 people. Peraton hires a lot of temp agency contractors, which isn't uncommon with companies in these sectors, but these hires aren't the best quality, usually, nor are they invested in the work they do because they're being churned through and spat out. On all the teams I've worked on, management usually never pushes back on clients, leading to us having never-ending moving goal post situations and micromanagement from the clients. On one particular team, I also saw that management's attitude of always capitulating to the client, led to a toxic dynamic where the client was unprofessional and rude, cracking jokes at us and our work during presentations. In this situation, management had the attitude that we should just smile and take it. It would have been nice to see management actually stand up and defend their employees and ask for professionalism and basic courtesy. Not all the teams I've worked on, but most are using tech stacks that are quite archaic and bad. It causes efficiency issues, tech debt, and makes for a poorer product due to limitations. But in all my struggles to push for modernization, I've been met with an attitude of, "Well who's going to pay for it?" Also note, a decent number of the stellar reviews on here read as if they were written by someone in HR trying to boost Peraton's reputation. I have doubts about their authenticity.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 91 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,920 Peraton reviews submitted anonymously by Peraton employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Peraton is right for you.