Cons:
Highly unstable — constant restructures, layoffs, and shifting priorities.
Leadership lacks real connection to day-to-day operations; often more focused on corporate buzzwords than actionable plans.
Someone was leaving almost every week, many of them voluntarily — usually the most skilled and experienced staff is actively looking for another job.
The company struggled to retain top talent while holding on to underperformers, which affected team morale and productivity.
Advancement or even job security often depended more on being agreeable to whoever was temporarily in charge, rather than on actual performance or results.
Reported to four different managers in a couple of years, lack of continuity and clear direction.