Scientific Games reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(1,405 total reviews)

Patrick McHugh

75% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Scientific Games has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 1,405 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Scientific Games employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Sep 1, 2018

Great place to work.... Not.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-can wear t-shirt/jeans and sneakers. -good work-life balance usually. -free lunches fridays during summer, and breakfast mondays during winter.

Cons

- What started off as a great company quickly turned into an utter mess and joke of a place. - This place instills fear into employees, unless you are "in". - Overtime galore. - They out scource their jobs to other countries, and lay off people with the most knowledge of how things work. Just to save a buck. - Health care sucks. Do not apply here if you or a family member have health problems, every year ther insurance gets worse. They just let go 20+ more people. Most of these people have contributed to the culture. Some remaining will also be fearing for their positions no matter what they think their standing is in the company - aside from management. They have free lunches fridays, breakfast mondays. However, they fired most of these people that organize it. So no free lunches or breakfasts, one of the redeeming qualities of the place. They DO have a "fully stocked kitchen" but, employees MUST PAY for the food items, most tech companies that promise this pay for the food.... They also have fun arcade games and a ping pong&pool table. But like a reviewer said, EMPLOYEES brought in those arcade games. Nothing this company does is for the employees, despite what they may say. Favoritism runs rampant at this place. Even if you think you are in the "in" crowd. They will not get rid of some people in the higher positions. Even as games fail, the people who make the money making decisions for those failures are not held accountable. Instead of laying off even a single manager, they laid off 20+ who have no say in what gets put in the game. Although, many times people have argued with those management making decisions, most of the times they do not listen. If they did, everyone would still have their positions and the company would be making a lot of money. They do surveys and try to get people's opinions, but never listen to them. This was all a great waste of everyone's time. Many illegal and head scratching things have happened at this place. The whole company is aware of it. They have special retreats every year that costs the company tens of thousands. They try and penny pinch other things, but when it comes to parties and upper management using cards for lunches, they don't bat an eye. Yet if someone requests software or a keyboard it takes a while. The local "CEO" says how much of a "family" they are, and at every all staff say how much we've grown, and couldn't do it without all of us "family". A family would not let go of great workers who have worked there for 5+ years and contributed to their culture that they always brag about. This company also does not care who you are as a person, although it may seem like that. Many people have gotten praises and raises recently for their work ethic. If you are foriegn, or live outside the country hoping to get a visa, don't. Good people who only had a month left to get their work visas got let go. Who does that? They will find a reason to lay you off if they don't like you, but will spin it as "we are laying a bunch of people off, nothing personal." CEO only cares about his own ego. After this, not only will the people he let go not like him, but also the people remaining at the office. Everytime there will be an all staff, don't expect people to like you, or even want to be excited to what you have to say. No one will care now after this. No one will trust or believe you... This was a huge blow to the company. At this rate they have more managers than underlings. Yet they frown upon Letting mana gers go, even though most of them ccontribute nothing, they only fake it til they make it. Most of them have no idea what they are talking about. They say one thing, then an hour later claim they've never said it. Most of their decisions they retract and wait until the producT is almost o ut the door before they want to change something minor. That minor change costs many workers -and the company- hours, days, and precious money. Upper management either does not realize this, or they do, and do not care to do anything about the managerS... Instead lay blame on the workers. Many people in management are severely underqualified, despite how many "trainings" and management meetings they go to, they will never improve. Workers can tell them how they can imrpove upon their jobs, but they fall upon deaf ears. Do you know how much they care? After they do lay offs... They go out to party and drink. Yeehaw.

1.0
Jul 26, 2018

Stop faking it

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Climbing the ladder is easy when you know how to polish the right egos, you don't even have to know how to do your job Overtime isnt as bad as it used to be since people started quitting because of it

Cons

The company is broken and most of management doesn't know what they are doing. That is in Cedar Falls Iowa though I don't know about the rest of the company.

1.0
Sep 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you can handle your daily duties at SG you're capable of greatness in other organizations. SG, from day one, piles work and responsibility. At no time will you receive an org chart that assists you in your search for resources. When you have successfully navigated the maze of resource responsibilities you will have arrived with a skill-set that will make you a rock star in other companies. Its as if you're a consultant without a corporate resource and no actual map of the end product but a directive to make an ambiguous object great.

Cons

The environment is very political and heavily charged. Be ready to take a stance at every level. If you're not ready to step into the bull pen to fight for what you need or the direction you feel is necessary be ready to step back and take direction from those that may not have the knowledge and experience but do have a louder voice. The environment, among other things, lacks a professional atmosphere. Corporate policies are loose and the team dynamic is aggressive. Going into the environment you need to be prepared to achieve at all costs. The org lacks internal documentation, training, policy and procedure. Be prepared for micromanagement at numerous levels. There are no departmental boundaries or organizational feedback cycles. If you've made a mistake you will hear about it from numerous individuals on numerous teams. Errors in process or procedure are readily identified - errors are seen as weakness at the individual level and not something that is addressed after an actual gap analysis. The environment lacks actual tooling to streamline request cycles and workloads. HR is visibly not working to balance the leadership/ employee relationship or push leadership for the necessary resources to better enable the employee. If you take a complaint to HR be prepared to be managed out -- all of your mistakes no matter how minute will lead to administrative action that will eventually lead to your termination. HR does aggressively fight unemployment with as many roadblocks as they can muster.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 1,405 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,475 Scientific Games reviews submitted anonymously by Scientific Games employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Scientific Games is right for you.