Scientific Games reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(1,405 total reviews)

Patrick McHugh

75% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Scientific Games has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 1,405 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Scientific Games employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Mar 28, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

✅ Stable Job – If you just need job security, this company provides a steady paycheck. ✅ Office Infrastructure – Decent office space with necessary amenities. ✅ Opportunities for Learning – Some exposure to projects, but at the cost of excessive workload.

Cons

❌ Strict & Unrealistic Work Hours – Mandatory 9 AM - 6 PM office policy, no flexibility, and extra hours expected without appreciation. ❌ Terrible Work-Life Balance – Due to long commute times and additional meetings after hours, expect to spend 12-14 hours per day on work. ❌ Underwhelming Compensation – Salary not competitive compared to industry standards. The amount of effort required is not justified by the pay. ❌ No Remote Work Flexibility – Even when remote work is feasible, employees are forced to come to the office daily with no hybrid option. ❌ Toxic Higher Management & HR – Lack of empathy from HR and leadership. Employees are treated as mere resources, not as professionals with personal lives. ❌ Weekend Work – Be prepared to work on weekends if management decides there’s "urgent work"—which happens frequently.

5.0
Mar 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supporting, ample of opportunity to grow

Cons

No wfh allowed in company

Viewing 61 - 63 of 1,405 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,475 Scientific Games reviews submitted anonymously by Scientific Games employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Scientific Games is right for you.