Does Scientific Games pay their employees well?

According to anonymously submitted Glassdoor reviews, Scientific Games employees rate their compensation and benefits as 3.7 out of 5. Find out more about salaries and benefits at Scientific Games. This rating has improved by 3% over the last 12 months.

How satisfied are employees working at Scientific Games?

60% of Scientific Games employees would recommend working there to a friend based on Glassdoor reviews . Employees also rated Scientific Games 3.8 out of 5 for work life balance, 3.4 for culture and values and 3.4 for career opportunities.

What are the top reviewed jobs at Scientific Games?

Software Engineer (141) , Senior Software Engineer (76) , Associate Software Engineer (33) , Field Service Technician (29) , Test Engineer (27) , Manager (22) , Project Manager (21) , Software Developer (20) , Senior Test Engineer (18) , Director (16) , Product Manager (12) , Senior Manager (11) , Computer Operator (10) , Associate Test Engineer (9) , Quality Assurance Engineer (9)

What are the pros of working at Scientific Games according to real employee reviews?

"Work life balance and good" ((in 117 reviews)); "The people were great and there were many outside work events that I enjoyed" ((in 76 reviews)); "Good benefits with good team" ((in 74 reviews)); "Good salary and more work" ((in 65 reviews)); "good pay and company vehicle supplied" ((in 59 reviews))

What are the cons of working at Scientific Games according to real employee reviews?

"Managers are in this for themselves and don't care who they step on for their own sakes." ((in 30 reviews)); "Upper management is checked out and does not care about the employees." ((in 25 reviews)); "Frequent layoffs sometime creates job insecurity among employee" ((in 20 reviews)); "Favoritism is rampant and lack of meaningful work leads to sycophancy from top to bottom." ((in 17 reviews)); "No work From home" ((in 16 reviews))

What are employees saying about Scientific Games layoffs in 2026?

Explore Glassdoor’s employee reviews to understand what current and former employees are saying about Scientific Games layoffs and their outlook for job security at Scientific Games in 2026.

What are the top reviewed Scientific Games locations?

Alpharetta , Las Vegas , Chicago , Reno , Cedar Falls , Atlanta , Dover , Oklahoma City , Baltimore , Middletown , New York , Phoenix , Dallas , San Juan , Little Rock , Providence , Egg Harbor Township , Waukegan , Gardiner , Denver , Rocky Hill , Harrisburg , Philadelphia , Pittsburgh , Duluth , McCook , Burlington , Jamaica , Yonkers , Appleton

Skip to content Skip to footer

Notifications

Scientific Games

Scientific Games reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(1,406 total reviews)

Patrick McHugh

75% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Ratings by category

3.8

Work/Life balance

3.7

Diversity & inclusion

3.7

Compensation and benefits

3.4

Culture & values

3.4

Career opportunities

3.2

Senior management

Scientific Games has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 1,406 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Scientific Games employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Ratings by demographic groups

Race / Ethnicity

Gender

Sexual orientation

Disability

Parent or family caregiver

Veteran status

Reviews by job title

1K reviews

4.0

Jun 3, 2017

SG Job

Software engineer

Recommend

CEO approval

Business Outlook

Pros

It is providing nice working environment

Cons

Some times we need to stretch more over night also for complete task.

4.0

May 28, 2017

A good employer to work for

Anonymous employee

Recommend

CEO approval

Business Outlook

Pros

Managers are reasonable. Flexible working hours Good life and work balance

Cons

Some other teams are not really cooperative. Workers in the department are not getting recognized for the works they have been doing

1.0

May 25, 2017

Quality Operations

Anonymous employee

Recommend

CEO approval

Business Outlook

Pros

Some limited departments are well cared for. If you're a programmer, might be ok. In a crazy, chaotic and dangerous environment, you might do well even by accident.

Cons

Lacking ethics. No concept of continuous improvement process. Middle management is less concerned with effective business and more concerned that failures not be traceable to them. Advancements are too often based on "juice" and/or nepotism. Executives are busy working stock options and are clueless about how the company operates. Company has no interest in updating its outdated mindset. Talent is oppressed so that management lacking talent can remain secure - It's better not to be TOO capable.

Viewing 1186 - 1188 of 1,406 Reviews

Top companies for "Compensation and Benefits" near you

Apple

4.2★Compensation & Benefits

Intel Corporation

3.8★Compensation & Benefits

Qualcomm

4.0★Compensation & Benefits

Honeywell Technologies

4.0★Compensation & Benefits

Jobs at Scientific Games

Database Administrator - PostgreSQL

Field Service Tech I, OKC area

Managing Director of the Mid-Atlantic Territory

Scientific Games reviews FAQs

Reviews Scientific Games reviews

Scientific Games

Scientific Games reviews

Ratings by category

Ratings by demographic groups

Reviews by job title

SG Job

A good employer to work for

Quality Operations

Top companies for "Compensation and Benefits" near you

Jobs at Scientific Games

Scientific Games reviews FAQs

Want the inside scoop on your own company?

Bowls

Followed companies

Job searches

Top companies for "Compensation and Benefits" near you

Jobs at Scientific Games

Scientific Games reviews FAQs