Scientific Games reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(1,406 total reviews)

Patrick McHugh

75% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Scientific Games has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 1,406 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Scientific Games employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
2.0
Sep 14, 2015

Supervisor

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great employees they all work so hard. Great benefits.

Cons

The upper management team for logistics is out of control. No on in the department takes any ownership of anything. The entire team does nothing but put blame of the supervisors. It is a very uncomfortable department to work in. You need to constantly look over your shoulder.

1.0
Sep 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you can handle your daily duties at SG you're capable of greatness in other organizations. SG, from day one, piles work and responsibility. At no time will you receive an org chart that assists you in your search for resources. When you have successfully navigated the maze of resource responsibilities you will have arrived with a skill-set that will make you a rock star in other companies. Its as if you're a consultant without a corporate resource and no actual map of the end product but a directive to make an ambiguous object great.

Cons

The environment is very political and heavily charged. Be ready to take a stance at every level. If you're not ready to step into the bull pen to fight for what you need or the direction you feel is necessary be ready to step back and take direction from those that may not have the knowledge and experience but do have a louder voice. The environment, among other things, lacks a professional atmosphere. Corporate policies are loose and the team dynamic is aggressive. Going into the environment you need to be prepared to achieve at all costs. The org lacks internal documentation, training, policy and procedure. Be prepared for micromanagement at numerous levels. There are no departmental boundaries or organizational feedback cycles. If you've made a mistake you will hear about it from numerous individuals on numerous teams. Errors in process or procedure are readily identified - errors are seen as weakness at the individual level and not something that is addressed after an actual gap analysis. The environment lacks actual tooling to streamline request cycles and workloads. HR is visibly not working to balance the leadership/ employee relationship or push leadership for the necessary resources to better enable the employee. If you take a complaint to HR be prepared to be managed out -- all of your mistakes no matter how minute will lead to administrative action that will eventually lead to your termination. HR does aggressively fight unemployment with as many roadblocks as they can muster.

3.0
Sep 11, 2015

SG Gaming UK

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They have great products, an extensive and international footprint, and well known trade brands. Also some decent online acquisitions especially social.

Cons

Still sorting out the pile of spagetti that is SG + Suffle + WMS + Bally +.... also US corporate don't always run online businesses well!

Viewing 1321 - 1323 of 1,406 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,476 Scientific Games reviews submitted anonymously by Scientific Games employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Scientific Games is right for you.