Simon-Kucher reviews

4.0

66% would recommend to a friend

(629 total reviews)
avatar

Dr. Gunnar Clausen and Joerg Kruetten

77% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

Simon-Kucher has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 629 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Simon-Kucher employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

629 reviews
2.0
Feb 21, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very friendly and collaborative culture, especially at the base of the pyramid - Consultants will learn quickly and develop a skillset that can be transferred to the industry. - Great exit opportunities - Company is always growing, so you’ll grow together. You earn trust and responsibility early on. - Time to partnership is fast if that’s a track you’re trying to pursue. - Opportunities to spend time internationally (prior to covid)

Cons

- Base salaries and bonuses are lower than those of 2nd and even 3rd tier consulting firms. - Benefits are subpar and old-school (for example, only 15 days of PTO) - Company is growing without control and doesn’t have consultants to staff on projects. This model benefits partners only, as consultants are facing mental distress for working long hours, partners are too busy and can’t provide guidance and Directors and Senior Managers are promoted too fast and don’t have the required expertise to lead teams and projects. - There’s almost no opportunities to learn outside of project work. Conversations about career with coaches and partners are very rare and evaluation process is a scorecard that doesn’t provide a lot of insights. Many times the feedback won’t be helpful either. - Lack of diversity. - As consultants get to Manager and Director level, they start managing two or more projects simultaneously and are also required to work on Business Development initiatives (gotta keep selling). This leads to even longer hours at these levels, and it becomes nearly impossible to deliver projects with the required quality. - Turnover is extremely high. Young consultants leave left and right and now Managers and Directors are also leaving given the long hours and fast growth environment. At the same time, the company hires many MBAs at Manager level with no previous experience in Pricing and/or consulting. - Projects are strategic and consultants get exposure to senior stakeholders on the client side. However, SKP does not work with the top firms in the US. For example in tech, SKP has almost no experience with top tech firms. The company does really well when advising startups, but typically struggles to deliver when clients are a bit more sophisticated. For example, the typical client won’t have any Pricing expert or Pricing team. When they do, and when challenges are more complex, SKP’s typical cake recipe does not fit in. Teams will need to recreate the wheel and work even longer hours. - Senior leadership knows about all these problems and does very little to address them. Now, readers will ask: if quality of projects has deteriorated, people are unhappy and leaving, and pay is subpar, how is the company growing still? Demand for pricing work will continue to be high in the next years and SKP will continue to be the “McKinsey of Pricing”. Partners are smart and will continue to sell. Long-term, however, it is uncertain whether the company will be able to continue to deliver at high standards.

1.0
Jul 28, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Life Science practice in US is profitable. Industrials practice struggling in the US. - At least the junior / younger consultants are somewhat friendly - You'll learn a lot about pricing (but the world is so much bigger than that)

Cons

- During COVID, company panicked long before other companies panicked. 25% pay cuts employees in the US, drastic staffing cuts/firing/layoffs, major furloughs outside of US - Some really rude/dispassionate leadership. Several times the advice was "you either make the cut or you don't." Lack of mentorship that actually cares about your development (e.g., gives you projects, connections). - Failure to take care of their employees. Company package (salary, benefits) are not enough to warrant the daily abuse. - Lack of representation of women in staff and leadership. Their idea of a diverse environment is limited to one in which there are more white women. - Branding and marketing is atrocious. Thinks they are not purely market research focused when they really are, and everything is about pricing even though they brand themselves as marketing strategists. It doesn't make sense. This branding extends to their employees, who would otherwise like to do something different with their lives but can't because of the company image. - Leadership has really lost touch with their staff and with reality and is too Euro-focused while US leadership lacks the willpower to challenge Euro-centric practices. - Company thinks they are tier 1 consulting when they are tier 2.5 at best. - NOT minority and LGBTQ+ friendly. No employee resource group, no D&I initiative that focuses on minorities of LGBTQ+ folks. Some leadership has even downplayed the importance of minorities/underrepresented identities. - At the end of the day, they just want to make money and move on, with or without you. - Massive scope creep on projects, motivated by partners trying to sell more for less - They do not have an identifiable culture or spirit. Extremely reproducible firm. What culture they purport to have goes out the window when it comes to internal competition. Having friends at work does not count as having culture. - Lack of social conscience. Doing a couple pro-bono projects is enough enough to say you have a social conscience.

2.0
Aug 22, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There's 3 Simon Kucher's I worked for. Before Covid, during Covid and post Covid. Before Covid: Good collaborative environment, camaraderie, fun events, pleasant 'in office" work atmosphere. Partners are the bosses of course but they never truly came off as "bosses" Easy open door policy, no issues getting some face time. During Covid: Absolutely amazing support, everyone truly understood what was at stake and pulled together to do the absolute best they could. After Covid: See CONS.

Cons

After Covid: Company became a faceless corporation. People became numbers. Facetime and open door absolutely disappeared, lack of regard for anyone despite their work ethic, contribution, and skills. Absolute lack of transparency, people were let go on a whim, absolutely no HR support for anyone. HR turnover nearly 100% in a matter of 2 years, the current HR are full servants of the partners. Partners themselves with some minuscule exceptions have embraced this. The same ones who applauded everyone during Covid, decided that the only way they can be bosses again is by having their minions in the office. Hybrid yes, but very much frowned upon if you do adhere to it.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 629 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,206 Simon-Kucher reviews submitted anonymously by Simon-Kucher employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Simon-Kucher is right for you.