Smartsheet reviews

3.2

41% would recommend to a friend

(1,299 total reviews)
avatar

Rajeev Singh

29% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Smartsheet has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 1,299 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Smartsheet employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
4.0
Dec 29, 2020

Really good people but slow career progression

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Great values and a supportive place to work - Good Benefits - Smart colleagues - Lots of freedom to take charge

Cons

- Slow career progression. Unless you're truly exceptional (in a team of very good people), it takes a minimum of 3-4 years to get a promotion from an entry level data position. - Most of the data leaders are not very experienced. There is no executive leader in the company with years of technical data science experience in the industry. As a result, there is very less focus on groundbreaking data science work and it's mostly building reports and ad-hoc data pulls.

3.0
Nov 4, 2020

Working in Smartsheet

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Many great developers, attractive compensations.

Cons

The monolithic core system. Hard to maintain. Bug fixing seems endless.

5.0
Nov 3, 2019

Change is creating challenges.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fast paced growth, global expansion, evolving product, opportunities to adapt and grow with the business. Three complimentary acquisitions in less than 2 years including retention of talented team members from acquisitions. If you want to grow in your career, there are plenty of opportunities, some roles haven’t been created yet. C-suite not afraid of making bold decisions and personnel changes where needed. Recent changes in engineering roles and reduction of managers to individual contributors is a great example. The ratio of managers to individual contributors was too high, especially in QA roles, and release failures were not improving, change was necessary. While not popular, a bold decision was needed to make improvement. The reaction from several of the managers and senior leaders. provided great insight to the lack of mature leadership adaptability and why the change was necessary. A public company cannot operate in a start up mode forever, change is necessary and adaptability needs to be a core competency of every manager and above level. Our CTO leads by example, has brought customer focus to the forefront of the engineering team and had to address leaders and individual contributors who were more focused on the life balance of the equation for too many years.

Cons

Too much focus on “the next set of features” and insufficient understanding of adaptation and customer usage of current feature set. Fixing the current feature set should take equal priority to new features. Lack of robust change management processes and tracking of change impact. Maturation of several teams and many leaders who have grown with the company is insufficient to lead change. Many of the teams and individuals are not prepared for the change velocity that we are currently experiencing and there is unnecessary angst and lack of focus because of this. Leadership and management development in key competencies is needed.

Viewing 181 - 183 of 1,299 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,381 Smartsheet reviews submitted anonymously by Smartsheet employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Smartsheet is right for you.