Starkey reviews

3.4

61% would recommend to a friend

(444 total reviews)
avatar

Brandon Sawalich

45% approve of CEO

39% positive business outlook

Starkey has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 444 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Starkey employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

444 reviews
3.0
Sep 10, 2013

Worried about the future

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Had the best hours and loved my job and everyone I worked with,

Cons

Benefits aren't the best. Management favors the Asians (which is 80% of the production area). No room for advancement, especially if you are labeled, and if you do you are usually required to take a pay cut, sometimes it's huge. Pay raises are not the best, you get nickel and dimed to death. Lay offs have been too frequent and getting back in is next to impossible.

4.0
May 20, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Starkey is stable and makes money. Many people have worked most if not all of their careers here, and they could certainly do worse. It's family oriented. Literally. It seems like husband/wife or father/son working at Starkey is quite common. It seems like a great environment if your background is audiology or digital signal processing or RF engineering especially if you have an advanced degree in one of those disciplines. The company is conservatively managed so they weathered the 2008 recession reasonably well. Pay and benefits are competitive. The revenue sharing plan is a nice recent addition. EP is a large campus with decent amenities including two cafeterias. The hiring process is pretty strong so there are very few bad employees.

Cons

On some projects, processes are weak. Multi-million dollar projects are kicked off with documentation lacking. It seems in some instances Starkey doesn't understand or doesn't believe that the earlier you find defects the cheaper it is to fix them. Creating documents with an adequate level of detail and then reviewing them with the appropriate people is a good way to identify these problems early. Key projects/products have been outsourced, creating a void of knowledge among those that maintain the product. Outsourcing results have been disappointing, ending up with significant development still performed in-house. Short grey cubicles made out of cheap countertop material - made in-house for some reason. In many areas these cubes are crammed so close together that only one person can walk the aisle between them. There's virtually no place to store your technical books so they get left at home. The revenue sharing is definitely nice, but not always equitable. What I mean is that you are much better off if you contribute a little to every program release than if you contribute heavily to one program release only. The formula that is used will cap the amount given to an individual for any one program release. This means someone who works on an 18-month project will get a bonus only for that program release and it is very likely to be capped. Another employee who works on 3 6-month programs may put in the same level of effort in those 18 months, but will receive 3 smaller bonuses totaling more than the first employee's bonus because they never hit the cap. The 401k/ESOP match is given in company stock. This is not ideal because the company is private (i.e. the stock price changes once a year) and because you end up having too much invested in one company. You depend on Starkey for a paycheck and now you depend on Starkey for investment returns (and the hearing aid industry is likely slow growth). I'd rather have the 401k/ESOP match under my control to invest somewhere else. Starkey is not going to end up like Enron, but you get the general idea of why you want to diversify. New employees must also wait a long time before they are eligible to even participate with their own contributions - sometimes up to a year. Vacation time is good but not as generous as it sounds because Starkey observes fewer holidays than most companies - 6 versus 8-10 in some places.

2.0
Nov 6, 2025

CEO would rather be a celebrity than Manager

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

We host amazing events! This allows our CEO and the rest of the executive team to act like celebrities.

Cons

CEO is regularly posting on instagram about the celebrities he is rubbing elbows with or the lavish trips he is taking. In his recent post he talks about taking a few days with his wife who is also the head of HR to go to the UK and see the sites before he goes to the Starkey UK event...is he tone deaf that most employees can't go to the UK just for a few days to have fun???

Viewing 154 - 156 of 444 Reviews

Glassdoor has 518 Starkey reviews submitted anonymously by Starkey employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Starkey is right for you.