Pros
Promising technology, depth and breadth of engineering talent, even while significatly depleted recently, existing and potential customers ready to spend billions on Symbotic systems if things will work right. The recent assumption of the CEO role by the owner (so I've heard) shows that he really cares about the company. This is not a solution by itself, but a prerequisite for a positive change.
Cons
I've been at Symbotic for more than three years and left in 2017 when it seemed there is hardly any hope left. I've seen the previous leadership transition from Tony Affuso to Chris Gahagan. While Affuso wasn't a technology leader, he was respectful of talent and knew how to manage people. Gahagan's reign began with some promise, but after a few months turned into the most toxic and disrespectful environment I've seen in my career. Upper management (mostly Gahagan's cronies) has been the biggest problem for Symbotic in the last couple of years. They have no vision beyond slave-driving employees (who end up running away), blaming others for their own mistakes, and devising endless plans and "initiatives" that have very little relation to reality. I pity the next company that will hire Chris Gahagan for any kind of management role. As for Symbotic, if it could overcome his toxic legacy, it could be on the right path and fulfill at least some of its potential.
