employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

The Washington Post reviews

3.1

35% would recommend to a friend

(641 total reviews)
avatar

Jeff D’Onofrio

Not enough data to show CEO approval

13% positive business outlook

The Washington Post has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 641 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The The Washington Post employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

641 reviews
1.0
Sep 20, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work-life balance - you get at least three weeks paid vacation and 15 sick days on top of it and generally management doesn't hassle you about utilizing all those days to the fullest. Very laid-back atmosphere - easy to feel comfortable here

Cons

Not a place for young people looking for aggressive career growth and challenges. At its heart, the WP is a very old school company that is best suited for older people.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
9y
Thank you for the review and feedback. We're glad you enjoyed many things about The Post- life/work balance, vacation days, etc. We have a commitment toward growth and making The Washington Post a great place to work for all. We’d love to hear more specifics about your feedback. Feel free to e-mail us: life@washpost.com.
1.0
Sep 17, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are looking for a job that will give you a great balance between work and personal time and that ensures job security, Washington Post is the place to be. It's got an incredibly relaxed environment, people are super friendly, management is very accessible, very little, if any, overtime, and it's definitely a place that people get comfortable in (and stay forever).

Cons

If you're young, talented, aggressive and like a quick speed, this is NOT the place to be. Extremely bureaucratic, very little room for advancement, no bonus structure for many employees, change happens at a snail's pace, and they do NOT know how to take advantage of talent when they see it. There's no social environment - people are very friendly but there are no happy hours, no events, nothing like that. If you're older and don't really care about this stuff, then sure it's great. But if you're younger and talented- STAY AWAY!

avatar
The Washington Post Response
9y
Thank you for your review and feedback. We're sorry you had a negative experience working at The Post. Many of our employees give the feedback that they love the people who work here. Many teams organize social events within work and outside of work. We'd love to hear more specific feedback to help us grow. Feel free to e-mail us: life@washpost.com. We have a commitment toward growth and making The Washington Post a great place to work for all.
3.0
Jan 26, 2021

Great place to work if you're a white male (preferably on the older side)

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Name recognition, seemingly unlimited resources because of the billionaire owner, no evidence of the owner messing with the journalism in any way, great job security, demand for excellent work. Depending on the team you're on, you can have a wonderful experience here.

Cons

White men can misbehave with no consequences, whereas women and POCs who speak out respectfully are labeled problematic. Some editors very clearly pay more attention and give more opportunities to white men.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 641 Reviews

Glassdoor has 711 The Washington Post reviews submitted anonymously by The Washington Post employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Washington Post is right for you.