onsemi reviews

3.2

52% would recommend to a friend

(1,634 total reviews)
avatar

Hassane El-Khoury

45% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

onsemi has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 1,634 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The onsemi employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
3.0
Jun 12, 2017

Poor HR Policies

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ON Semiconductor serves a large market of integrated semiconductors. Think of it as a mini-TI. Plenty of internal opportunities are available.

Cons

HR policies are cheap, stingy and outdated. Technical individual contributors are not recognized with compensation; even if they have years or decades providing results beyond their pay-grade. Policy for raises are 10% max. Raises at most once a year but more likely every 5 years. Degrees are needed for promotions: i.e. technician to engineer. Degrees do not equal immediate promotions. You might have to wait; you might not even get a promotion. Bonuses do not apply to most employees, only the top engineers and management. You can get a "Bravo Award" bonus but only if your manager goes to bat for you.

3.0
Apr 21, 2017

Old School

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large company with all sorts of different things you can work on. Deep engineering history in Silicon development and manufacturing

Cons

Sr executive management tends to be treated like royalty and the rest of the employees are treated as easily replaceable. Promotions are limited and with many acquisitions they are a bit of a smattering of various cultures.

1.0
Dec 23, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The cafeteria is good. The emphasis on green energy is impressive. Working conditions and the office environment is attractive. There are some training opportunities.

Cons

The gap between ideals and reality at On Semiconductor is big and it is getting worse. It is covered to some degree by a rising stock price and its recent acquisitions, but the cancer is still there. A claim is that On Semiconductor’s core values are “initiative, respect, and integrity.” In terms of initiative, there is no system development life cycle that protects software inventory and facilitates quality and time to market. Agile doesn’t exist and nor does service-oriented architecture in any meaningful sense. What am to make of a team where there are no team meetings, no project plans, no approved requirements, little or inadequate test plans or data, no quality control, no six sigma, and where the loudest, most conservative, and most junior voices define on-the-fly software development? The result is that teams around the clock try to support an ancient, organically developed, brittle, obsolete system that throws repetitious software failures every day. The entire SDLC process is broken. It is responsible for the endless firefighting and routine deployment and execution failures far in excess of what is typical of organizations of that size. The silos at On Semiconductor are such that there is poor communication and where collaboration is defined by e-mails rather than through face to face interactions. What could take days elsewhere to develop takes weeks or months at On Semiconductor. And no one who has authority cares or knows what to do if they do care. In terms of respect and integrity, what am I to make of the dishonesty, duplicity, and vileness that infects parts of On Semiconductor? The overall atmosphere approached in my view the legal definition of a hostile workplace. Because of the offshoring and the redundancy of roles in the wake of acquisition integration, some people are afraid and that fear brings out a certain element of ruthlessness from those who are insecure about their long term prospects. While that is an explanation, it does not justify or mitigate the tendency to unethical behavior at On Semiconductor. The problems at On Semiconductor are real and they are serious. Consider yourself warned. There is the proverb that “fish stinks from the head first.” There is little leadership at the departmental level. To the contrary, there a strong “that’s the way we’ve always done things” mentality because of its bottom up organizational and architectural tendencies. Accordingly, I’m giving senior management and the CEO the lowest possible rating to encourage them to come to grips with these fundamental problems. While I’m no longer an employee, I am a shareholder, and I have an interest in seeing On Semiconductor succeed in spite of itself.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 1,634 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,966 onsemi reviews submitted anonymously by onsemi employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if onsemi is right for you.