Quite a lengthy process and was rejected without any feedback during the process (no emails sent). I never got any feedback until I asked the co-founder for it. I passed multiple choice Android test first try which wasn't too hard. I had an interview for an hour where I had to do tic-tac-toe and passed that. Then I had to schedule the two hour interview which included navigation drawer problem. I also was given some very random trivia questions which I had never been asked before that didn't have anything to do with Android development but more web stuff which I thought was uncalled for. Plus, I could just look them up online if I wanted to. They were quite basic and could be looked up in like less than 1 min. In the end, I was told that I did pretty well compared to other candidates by the interviewer but no offer. I also was told a bunch of untrue stuff like "there were communication problems" which I never heard of during the interview and don't know where they came up with that. In addition, I was told that I didn't have enough "depth of Android experience" which confused me since the interviewer didn't really go into depth about Android anyway. Also, it took them over the stated 24-48hours for my status to update on the website, so shame on them for that. I thought it was supposed to be blind interview too yet the interviewer asked what my previous employment was and which university I went to at the end.... It goes against their whole premise of the "blind" interview process and just opens up pedigree bias.